Jump to content

A Quantum Loop Multiverse Hypothesis by Alopeciaphile


Alopeciaphile

Recommended Posts

/*So like the loops of a computer code as it starts with an initialized point and so starting the iterations infinitely

. Reminds one of the singular point of the cosmos and the everything and much more, all starting from the singularity;

where time stops up to the point of the big bang we get an infinite amount of universes. What I propose of course in a rather

strange phenomenon you have a singularity and that explodes and gives birth to more and more singularities and those singularities

give birth to their own singularities for which their own respective big bangs and big crunches would occur and due to the original's infinite energy it can split amongst

the other singularities an infinite amount of times equally leading to infinite universes to come from all the other infinite singularities

and this would also give the already newborn universes a chance to occupy their own shared space in what I call the "Cosmic plane of existence" allowing for links between

universes to occur surely what must be able to combine can surely split somehow, Spray reactions is the most probable cause to have a single singularity of infinite density

split equally into other singularities without disappearing, surprisingly, spray reactions can align with thermodynamics, "somehow", if the resulting split makes one black hole or singularity bigger than the others it combined with, now what if I said the first singularity of

infinite density and energy to ever exist has went on to big bang itself and produce multiple other singularities of a smaller infinities, and then those singularities would spawn other singularities of even smaller infinities, and the process keeps on going . This would agree with the idea of an branching effect in that all the scenarios that ever could occur are possible with the splitting of these singularities and explosion reaction of those singularities of infinite densities as from one singularity you get two then from two to four and from four to six or perhaps from 1 you get hundreds and thousands even, where choices are possible. Then here comes the realm of computer science and string theory and if we were to ever mathematically link the fabric of universe and computer code what I speculate for the grand program of the multiverse is one similar to this:

*/

#include<iostream>

#include <string>

using std::cout;

using std::cin;

using std::endl;


int main()

{

int i=1;

int singularity;

int universes=1;


cout<<singularity<<endl;//The true beginning.

do

{

 

cout<< i<< endl;

//To show how many times cosmic energy ignited during a singularity as part of the 'Cosmic plane of existnce'

//which is like a bag which holds an infinite amount of singularities exploding over and over

i++;

cout<<universes<<endl;

//The Universe number and bigbang number, this would also be the type of code if mathematically proven of what our universe would reveal about itself as part of this theory.

universes++;

cout<<singularity<<endl;

//The potential energy of a singularity in the cosmic plane of existence.


} while (i>=0&&universes>=0);

}

//This is all but a mere theory , yet one incredibly exciting on my part, whichever way this may be looked at I too hold truth to it as a child's imagination,

//criticism is again a virtue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok at least your starting on the right foot with mentioning this is only a Speculation.

 

This thread will most likely be moved there I would do so myself except you posted this on two locations.

 

http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/98203-repost-a-quantum-loop-multiverse-hypothesis/?fromsearch=1

Edited by Mordred
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colbourne was the programmer. I'm not sure which language he used. The calculator itself was the brain child of Jorrie who has a Ph.d in philosophies of Cosmology.

 

Marcus (retired astrophysicist) and myself made suggestions and wrote most of the guides. We all equally tested the accuracy of the calculator vs known datasets. Each new dataset (WMAP and Planck) we retested the calc. In some cases we had to extend the range on key parameters.

 

Unfortunately the latex doesn't post well on this forum. That portion was setup for another forum I visit. I've tried correcting the latex copy/paste for this site but get size limit errors.

 

As to your post. What you have has similarities to chaotic eternal inflation and bubble universe creation. Leading to multiverse.

 

LQC has a similar model in that regard.

 

A few key points. Singularity does not mean a BH type singularity. In the BB its of unknown volume. The point like description you see on tv is just our Observable universe contracted to a point.

 

Secondly it wasn't an explosion... it was a rapid expansion.

 

the two has different dynamics. An explosion has a centre ie origin. It also radiates outward. We describe this as anistropic and inhomogeneous.

 

Expansion has no centre nor direction. It is homogenous and isotropic.

 

homogenous = no Preferred location

isotropic = no preferred direction.

 

Secondly You will need to learn the math in order to program your model. I would recommend reading these from my site. Which you probably already visitted.

Site Articles (Articles written by PF and Site members)

 

http://cosmology101.wikidot.com/redshift-and-expansion

http://cosmology101.wikidot.com/universe-geometry

 

Misconceptions (Useful articles to answer various Cosmology Misconceptions)

 

http://www.phinds.com/balloonanalogy/ : A thorough write up on the balloon analogy used to describe expansion

http://tangentspace.info/docs/horizon.pdf :Inflation and the Cosmological Horizon by Brian Powell

http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.4446 :"What we have leaned from Observational Cosmology." -A handy write up on observational cosmology in accordance with the LambdaCDM model.

http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0310808 :"Expanding Confusion: common misconceptions of cosmological horizons and the superluminal expansion of the Universe" Lineweaver and Davies

http://www.mso.anu.edu.au/~charley/papers/LineweaverDavisSciAm.pdf:"Misconceptions about the Big bang" also Lineweaver and Davies

 

The last two articles helped develop that calculator in particular the stretch parameter. The articles above will help with misconceptions. Also to understand expansion.

 

the articles below will help teach the required math.

 

Training (textbook Style Articles)

 

http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0004188v1.pdf :"ASTROPHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY"- A compilation of cosmology by Juan Garcıa-Bellido

http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0409426 An overview of Cosmology Julien Lesgourgues

http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0503203.pdf "Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology" by Andrei Linde

http://www.wiese.itp.unibe.ch/lectures/universe.pdf:" Particle Physics of the Early universe" by Uwe-Jens Wiese Thermodynamics, Big bang Nucleosynthesis

 

A couple of them are full length Textbooks.

 

Key note "spray" is also the wrong dynamics. A spray has a preferred direction and location.

 

edit if LQC is your preferred approach. That site has an introduction to LQC.

Edited by Mordred
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No problem, there is nothing inherently wrong with the concept of a multiverse.

 

You can split an infinite universe, an infinite number of times and each universe can still be infinite in size.

 

The basis of chaotic eternal inflation past the mathematics is an anistrophy region that expands at a different rate than the parent universe.

 

Black holes as universe generators have been proposed but this is extremely tricky to keep homogenous and isotropic. Poplowskii once tried this, his metrics is a good approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.