Jump to content

Life Without a Sun


Kmurphy22

Recommended Posts

I have lately been pondering the possibility of life existing on a planet that does not have a sun. So far the little research I've done has suggested that the core would have to be hot enough, coupled with a much thicker atmosphere in order to hold an appropriate temperature to sustain life. Other than that I'm pretty stuck.

 

What would be the parameters of such a core and/or atmosphere?

 

Also, the biggest mystery to me is how plant life would be able to thrive, or if life could possibly thrive without plants at all (probably a topic for a different thread).

 

Any information would be much appreciated. Thank you!

Edited by Kmurphy22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't copy/paste text on my Vita, but NASA's website has an interesting article from 2001 on creatures discovered living by a hydrothermal vent, if you do a Google (or whichever) search for NASA and hydrothermal vent life, the title of the piece is "Life as we didn't know it".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The term you should 'google' (if you have not already) is 'extremophiles' - these are organisms here on the Earth that live in environments that were thought not to be able to support life. Understanding these orgamisms may give us some clues as to what is possible eleswhere in the Univrerse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A recent NASA video asserted that a somewhat bigger than earth planet with a thick hydrogen atmosphere could maintain a surface temp high enough to allow liquid water oceans even drifting among the stars with no sun. It would be a planet type we don't see in our solar system... maybe 8 to 10 earth masses... twice the diameter of the earth. Radioactive decay would keep the core hot and the heat would diffuse to the surface. A large moon would also help create heat energy. surface pressure of 100 bar or so. chemical energy like the black smokers hydrothermal vents mentioned above.

 

It would be a very strange place. I wonder if the hydrogen atmosphere could also be used as an energy source. Photosynthesis breaks apart water to get hydrogen, possibly that reaction wouldn't be necessary to get hydrogen on such a planet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Photosynthesis is a somewhat later development. The point is not really the acquisition of hydrogen per se, but essentially liberation of electrons (or reducing equivalents) for energy conservation. Chemolithotrophy basically covers these range of oxidative processes. Of note, many, but not all chemolithotrophs are also extremophiles.

 

Forgot to add: because of this process, some bacteria (hydrogen oxidizers) can utilize hydrogen as an electron donor.

Edited by CharonY
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

A recent NASA video asserted that a somewhat bigger than earth planet with a thick hydrogen atmosphere could maintain a surface temp high enough to allow liquid water oceans even drifting among the stars with no sun. It would be a planet type we don't see in our solar system... maybe 8 to 10 earth masses... twice the diameter of the earth. Radioactive decay would keep the core hot and the heat would diffuse to the surface. A large moon would also help create heat energy. surface pressure of 100 bar or so. chemical energy like the black smokers hydrothermal vents mentioned above.

 

It would be a very strange place. I wonder if the hydrogen atmosphere could also be used as an energy source. Photosynthesis breaks apart water to get hydrogen, possibly that reaction wouldn't be necessary to get hydrogen on such a planet.

Sounds like a lot more efficient scheme than having a great fusion furnace 93 million miles away and relying on a very small percentage of the energy given off...

 

Another might be having a radioactive moon glowing with the equivalent heating. Might last long enough to sustain life for a while, though I suspect not much time for higher life to evolve.

Edited by J.C.MacSwell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Tidal heating of moon orbiting around lonely planet without star, could produce enough heat and temperature for life to appear or at least sustain existing one.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_heating_of_Io

Living organisms requiring visible light, like plants, would be not possible, without light obviously.

Edited by Sensei
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The term you should 'google' (if you have not already) is 'extremophiles' - these are organisms here on the Earth that live in environments that were thought not to be able to support life. Understanding these orgamisms may give us some clues as to what is possible eleswhere in the Univrerse.

+1

 

Also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemotroph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't imagine life without sun.

You have not been in Russia, Alaska, North Canada, Sweden, Finland, Norway or North/South Pole.

They have day/night taking up to ~half year.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_night

post-100882-0-45871400-1471957461_thumb.png

Instead they have Aurora

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora

Highly accelerated particles from the Sun, and cosmos hitting upper level of atmosphere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Without the sun there goes gravity! Without its gravity Earth would become a rogue planet. That means that it would perhaps be gravitationally caught in another star's orbit, plunge into it, or else travel forever in the frigid vastness of space. There are rogue stars in our galaxy right now which have been observed being ejected from the galactic core area at high velocity and heading for intergalactic space. Rogue planets a believed to be common.

Edited by Radrook2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without the sun there goes gravity! Without its gravity Earth would become a rogue planet. That means that it would perhaps be gravitationally caught in another star's orbit, plunge into it, or else travel forever in the frigid vastness of space.

The last option is by far the most likely and what this thread is about: could the internal heat of the planet, derived from the kinetic energy of construction and radioactivity, possibly supplemented by tidal heating if it has a moon, be sufficient to provide an environment suitable for life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.