Jump to content

discuss and criticize a scientific publication


katy fina

Recommended Posts

Katy - Most readers will assume this is a homework assignment.

 

While members may be happy to help address specific questions you have, at this point you haven't asked any.

 

You'll not likely get much response until you share your own thoughts, what criticisms you've already identified about the article, and where specifically you're getting stuck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't inderstand how i could criticize the author

 

Do you see any flaws in their approach?

Perhaps they concluded something too soon?

Maybe they made too many assumptions or used too few data points.

 

Think less about criticizing. Think more about specific ways to improve the paper. How could it be made better? What else might you have done differently if you were the author?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you see any flaws in their approach?

Perhaps they concluded something too soon?

Maybe they made too many assumptions or used too few data points.

 

Think less about criticizing. Think more about specific ways to improve the paper. How could it be made better? What else might you have done differently if you were the author?

I suppose what one is essentially doing, as a reviewer, is highlighting the faults or findings in a paper, so that the research might later be refined by the author or others.

Edited by StringJunky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.