Jump to content

Could a Wolverine and a Honey Badger produce a fertile hybrid offspring?


Recommended Posts

That does not a species make. The female liger cannot breed with a male liger. Really I don't think you will find anyone on here who is qualified enough to tell you if hypothetically you can mix those 2. And I would rather not know if someone here has that kind of first hand experience. I would say the odds are slim at best. Being in same family doesn't mean that much. You need a VERY VERY similar genetic structure. Like I don't think scientists are sure if humans can cross breed with chimps and we are like 98.8% same DNA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have different chromosome numbers a viable cross is practically impossible.

 

Well it is not entirely impossible but there are caveats. It is true that offspring from even closely related animals with different chromosome counts are normally sterile. An example would be mules that have 63 chromosomes. However, there have been reports of successful breeding between female mules and male donkeys. It is not common, though.

 

A better example are probably fish, as hybridization is easier (and probably also more common in nature). One example that I recall is a cross of a carp and a bream which have 100 and 48 chromosomes, respectively. A tetraploid offspring with 148 chromosomes was fertile, IIRC.

 

I should add that hybridization could be considered a bit of a special case.

Edited by CharonY
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aww, i thought this was regarding x-men.

 

The split between tiger and lion is estimated 6 million years ago, honey badger and wolverine over 20 million. It seems very unlikely.

 

That statement could be totally void, the time variable of a species splitting from each other and how much they diverge aren't correlative. Some species have needed not to evolve at all in a very long time and some of their closest variations wouldn't have either. Unlike certain species that are forced to evolve because of environmental factors.

 

I don't know the exact genetics on chromosome matching and embryonic development but its likely possible that they could have offspring, however it may take n^x amount of tries (say 10^6 and that's getting them to do business which wouldn't be easy). Its also possible that they have diverged too far an thus it is impossible, in such a case you'd probably only have to slightly modify the DNA of the sperm to get the desired results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you speculating wildly or do you have anything to back it up?

 

Pardon?

 

My answer was a pretty much catch all, either through probability they can have offspring otherwise if they have diverged too far then by splicing the sperm you would be able to achieve this. Thats science as i know it.

 

Or are you referring to time and correlation between differences in genes because i can certainly back it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All claims, if possible. To list them up: A) that there is no correlation between genetic divergence and divergence time. Keep in mind how divergence is estimated. B) that species that need not evolve do not. Also specify what you mean with "need not". C) how are species forced to evolve? D) what specifically do you mean with chromosome matching? E) what is the basis of your calculations? F) What specifically do you want to modify in sperm? G) What do you think would it accomplish? H) Why specifically sperm an not e.g. the oocyte? I) How would it be accomplished? J) What do you mean with "splicing" sperm?

 

There a a few good reasons why time alone is not a perfect estimator, and that it is certainly not universal in all groups. But your claims do not address these issues as far as I can tell. I would therefore be very interested in the specifics, as it is not quite clear to me what you mean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well a resulting female hybrid that's fertile is the objective. I suppose artificial insemination would have to be the only option. If female hybrid is fertile, she could be bred back with a different honey badger/wolverine in order to have a 75% Honey Badger, 25% Wolverine hybrid or 75% Wolverine 25% Honey Badger hybrid.

 

I'm just going by how Leopons are fertile and how a female Liger can be mated with a male Lion/Tiger to have a fertile offspring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, so to make it clear, the question cannot be unequivocally answered without actually trying it out. The reason is that small changes can create incompatibility. However, as a rule of thumb, the further species are apart, the lower the likelihood. Chromosome variances are more complicated in certain groups (in mammals it is usually a big problem), whereas in others it is less so.

So without actually having any data, one could assume that the likelihood for martens and wolverines would be higher than either with badgers. Yet time wise their split is still longer than e.g. horse and donkey, who already typically have fertility issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh my, so they're even far less likely to have fertile offspring than Leopons.

 

Would it be unethical to actually capture and artificially inseminate a Honey Badger/Wolverine? They're not endangered and scientists do it to mice all the time.

Edited by Capsule Corp.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.