Jump to content

Whining about moderation (split from supersymmetry)


Kramer

Recommended Posts

 

Moderator Note

Note: multiple posts have been split off: several OT posts and their responses.

http://www.sciencefo...etry-in-nature/

http://www.sciencefo...-supersymmetry/

Some explanations why I asked a question to the author of thread ”Supersymmetry in nature- prelude to new paradigm” and why this is a legitimate question. Even though is addressed by a lay-man that has very little to ad in this “high articulated debate” between moderators and author, I think that I have the civil right to take information in very natural reality, of physics, astronomy etc.
As the base of the thread was the repetitive reflection of properties of physics cubic objects in “a mirror”, I think that it is not wrong to ask that in micro and cosmos world objects are spherical and we don’t observe flat mirrors and cubes.
And I think that till here is not any hint about highjack.
But here was a flare of some moderators (and very sad when you see respectable ajb in this group), that bounced to catch some easy “quote”, which are the only responsible for deviation of debate out of course.
I admit that am interested in some statements of the author. About the recurrence of different properties of objects depending by distance, in “mirror” (for example their dimensions), I am eager to know how this happens in reality, not in virtual world.
Sure the moderator may call this high-jacking: but I see in this statement, maybe “a possible cause” why alleged “Plank electron”, in my hypothesis about sub particles, becomes real common electron, only by change of radius.
Is it to stir the pot?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Moderator Note

Note: multiple posts have been split off: several OT posts and their responses.

http://www.sciencefo...etry-in-nature/

http://www.sciencefo...-supersymmetry/[/size]

 

Some explanations why I asked a question to the author of thread ”Supersymmetry in nature- prelude to new paradigm” and why this is a legitimate question. Even though is addressed by a lay-man that has very little to ad in this “high articulated debate” between moderators and author, I think that I have the civil right to take information in very natural reality, of physics, astronomy etc.

As the base of the thread was the repetitive reflection of properties of physics cubic objects in “a mirror”, I think that it is not wrong to ask that in micro and cosmos world objects are spherical and we don’t observe flat mirrors and cubes.

And I think that till here is not any hint about highjack.

But here was a flare of some moderators (and very sad when you see respectable ajb in this group), that bounced to catch some easy “quote”, which are the only responsible for deviation of debate out of course.

I admit that am interested in some statements of the author. About the recurrence of different properties of objects depending by distance, in “mirror” (for example their dimensions), I am eager to know how this happens in reality, not in virtual world.

 

emphasis added.

 

It is not wrong to ask such a question. What is wrong is to ask it in someone else's thread — these questions are off-topic and not directed at the OP.

 

And it's a little disingenuous to claim that this is not a hijack, when you pre-emptively apologized for the hijack in the post for which you were warned. ("If, this was not the aim of author, I beg pardon for readers and o.p. for interfering in debate.")

 

 

Sure the moderator may call this high-jacking: but I see in this statement, maybe “a possible cause” why alleged “Plank electron”, in my hypothesis about sub particles, becomes real common electron, only by change of radius.

Is it to stir the pot?

 

Yes, I will call it hijacking, because that's what it is. This has nothing to do with the OP. You have used someone else's discussion to bring up a subject that you want to talk about. That is exactly what a hijack is. That's even without mention of your pet theory; that also is a hijack, and is a specific example of a hijack given in the rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

!

Moderator Note

 

 

Moderator Note

Note: multiple posts have been split off: several OT posts and their responses.

http://www.sciencefo...etry-in-nature/

http://www.sciencefo...-supersymmetry/

Some explanations why I asked a question to the author of thread ”Supersymmetry in nature- prelude to new paradigm” and why this is a legitimate question.

 

...

 

You must know by now that responses to moderation should not take place in the thread. This is doubly the case when staff have taken the time to move offending posts to the trash to allow the thread to continue without further interruption.

 

If you wish to discuss subsidiary topics or refine another members speculation then do so in a new thread. If you wish to complain about moderation then report the modnote. But do not continue to hijack other members' threads.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.