Jump to content

Is there a Feynman diagram which includes all particles in one? (electron, quark, pion, kaon, ...)


Recommended Posts

It is still not very clear exactly what you are looking for.

 

One technical issue here is that Feynman diagrams are graphical representations of propagators and these are used to construct S-matrices. All this has to do with scattering rather than bound states like atoms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is still not very clear exactly what you are looking for.

 

One technical issue here is that Feynman diagrams are graphical representations of propagators and these are used to construct S-matrices. All this has to do with scattering rather than bound states like atoms.

 

yes forget the ionic bond.... Rather it is possible to draw the scattering of one atom with one S-matrices diagram?

 

In fact I would like to reunite on a same Feynman diagram all kaon and pion. It is possible?

 

thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes forget the ionic bond.... Rather it is possible to draw the scattering of one atom with one S-matrices diagram?

You need all the diagrams to a given order to get a reasonable calculation of the scattering amplitude.

 

Anyway, you can write down diagrams for particles colliding with atoms. Though I think people are usually interested in either the interactions with the electrons in the shells or the nucleus rather than both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need all the diagrams to a given order to get a reasonable calculation of the scattering amplitude.

 

 

 

It interested me. it is expressed in eV /c ² ?

 

 

Anyway, you can write down diagrams for particles colliding with atoms.

 

just to link all pion in the same Feynman diagram (pion - antipion with the quark path)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be a mass. Cross sections are in units of length squared (area). Amplitudes are probabilites.

 

The amplitude isn't based on eV /c ² ? or which one?

 

What is the best diagram used to explain the interaction of decay particles? and also their positions in the atom (quark, electron)?

 

Thank you ajb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the best diagram used to explain the interaction of decay particles? and also their positions in the atom (quark, electron)?

You need to be more specific, but the tree level diagrams for simple decays are avaliable through google.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Negative beta decay for example

 

 

Feynman_Diagram_-_Negative_Beta_Decay.pn

 

Easy.

 

In a few days I'll show you mine which includes all diagrams like this one in in one.

 

I will meet all leptons (electron - tau - muon - quark)

 

I will meet all antileptons

 

I will meet all neutrinos

 

I will meet all antineutrinos

 

I will meet all bosons W - Z - g

 

 

I will meet the boson H

 

And I will meet the photon

Edited by Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I await your diagrams.

 

Ok. You can count on me. Just 24/48h

 

 

Good day

 

if you want I can already make all pions and kaons in ten minutes with paint ..

 

I come back

 

I based this model with that one ---> fermionic_model_ but it is a bit wrong (the pion+ is not in the right place)

 

_______________________________________________________________________

 

hi,

 

I did not draw boson. But you can already in indentify two (boson) in the case of the kaon box which is between d and s for W- and between anti-si and anti-d.

 

I let you imagine the rest, nuon, boson H with top quark ...

 

image link --> http://blogs.scienceforums.net/ArnaudAntoineANDRIEU/files/2013/06/atom_a.png

atom_a.png

 

I'll give you the complete diagram but not today. You can share it as you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hello,

 

I am drawing this one from wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Kaon-decay.png

 

Kaon-decay.png



I come back



atom_a_kaon_decay.png



Feynman diagrams has become obsolete..



this is a good scoop that, right?



It's name is atom PCB



but it's better to say atom A because of its shape



In the upper chamber of the pyramid is the atomic number.....if you add one more quark at your meson then you have a neutron. And if again you add a new quark with neutron, then you get a proton.



I await your diagrams.

 

 

then, not bad, no?

Edited by Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU
Link to comment
Share on other sites

at least I'm sure to find my diagrams on the books of physic by next fall.

 

No, this is not likely at all.

 

Your diagrams make no sense and you have not explained how they are used to do any predictions or explain any reactions. As ajb has noted already, you violate conservation of charge at various places. It also looks like you violate conservation of energy and/or momentum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.