Jump to content

Cosine identity for energy transmission of waves and speed of waves.


Vay

Recommended Posts

In reference to the average change in kinetic energy over time for waves moving along a string, (1/2)*u*v*(w^2)*(ymax^2)(average of ((cos(kx-wt))^2) over time), my textbook says "the average value of the square of a cosine function over an integer number of periods is (1/2)", thus the above equation reduces to (1/4)*u*v*(w^2)*(ymax^2). Can anyone explain the cosine identity, or whatever it is, used here(the other variables are not important, I only have question about the identity in the quotations)?

 

Also, what is the difference between the speed of waves defined as v = (wavelength)*(frequency) and v= square root of (tension/linear density)? My book says the speed is related to wavelength and frequency, but it is set by properties of the medium, which is the tension and linear density. Can someone explain this clearer?

Edited by Vay
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, what is the difference between the speed of waves defined as v = (wavelength)*(frequency) and v= square root of (tension/linear density)? My book says the speed is related to wavelength and frequency, but it is set by properties of the medium, which is the tension and linear density. Can someone explain this clearer?

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refractive_index

 

v = wavelength * frequency = c - in vacuum (because refractive_index of vacuum is 1)

and

v = c / refractive_index = wavelength * frequency / refractive_index - in some medium

 

f.e. refractive index of water is 1.333

so

v = c / 1.333 = 0.75c

and also

wavelength = wavelength in vacuum / 1.333

Edited by Przemyslaw.Gruchala
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refractive_index

 

v = wavelength * frequency = c - in vacuum (because refractive_index of vacuum is 1)

and

v = c / refractive_index = wavelength * frequency / refractive_index - in some medium

 

f.e. refractive index of water is 1.333

so

v = c / 1.333 = 0.75c

and also

wavelength = wavelength in vacuum / 1.333

 

The OP clearly states "waves moving along a string" Speed of light has nothing to do with the problem

 

In reference to the average change in kinetic energy over time for waves moving along a string, (1/2)*u*v*(w^2)*(ymax^2)(average of ((cos(kx-wt))^2) over time), my textbook says "the average value of the square of a cosine function over an integer number of periods is (1/2)", thus the above equation reduces to (1/4)*u*v*(w^2)*(ymax^2). Can anyone explain the cosine identity, or whatever it is, used here(the other variables are not important, I only have question about the identity in the quotations)?

 

http://www.ditutor.com/integrals/integral_cos_squared.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The easiest way to demonstrate this is to simply look at a graph of cos2(x). It's a periodic function, whose amplitude varies from 0 to 1. It's not unreasonable, therefore, to suspect that the average value of this function from 0 to 2pi is simply 1/2. If you do the integral, this turns out to be the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The easiest way to demonstrate this is to simply look at a graph of cos2(x). It's a periodic function, whose amplitude varies from 0 to 1. It's not unreasonable, therefore, to suspect that the average value of this function from 0 to 2pi is simply 1/2. If you do the integral, this turns out to be the case.

 

Isn't the intergral of (cos(x))^2, from 0 to 2pi, equal to pi/2? Or are you taking the integral of something else. The graphical interpretation makes more sense, where we're just taking the average of the two extreme y values of (cos(x))^2.

Edited by Vay
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't the intergral of (cos(x))^2, from 0 to 2pi, equal to pi/2? Or are you taking the integral of something else. The graphical interpretation makes more sense, where we're just taking the average of the two extreme y values of (cos(x))^2.

 

The integral isn't the average value — you were asking about the cosine identity used, which was given in the link. You have to take the next step and divide by the size of the interval.

http://archives.math.utk.edu/visual.calculus/5/average.1/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.