Jump to content

Do all photons have equal energy?


derek w

Recommended Posts

Do all photons have equal amounts of energy in 4 dimensional space-time?

They all travel at the speed of light.

 

What matters to us is how frequently they cross through our bit of 3 dimensional space?

Edited by derek w
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A photon's energy depends on its wavelength. So two photons can have different energy.

I understand that a photon's energy is related to it's wavelength.

But what I am asking is it's energy related to wavelength because we are only looking at a 3 dimensional cross section of 4 dimensions.

In 4 dimensions photons do not have different energies?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand that a photon's energy is related to it's wavelength.

But what I am asking is it's energy related to wavelength because we are only looking at a 3 dimensional cross section of 4 dimensions.

 

No. There is no time dependence, so it doesn't matter if you included a fourth dimension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there different kinds of photons?

They're all alike, only difference is their frequency. A "blue" photon is the exact same as a "red" one, except for its frequency (or wavelength/energy, but those 3 are all related to eachother).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those whose idol is Sheldon Cooper (poor souls): Being really pedantic one could argue that the mere concept of "a photon's energy" doesn't make sense in the first place in "4 dimensional space-time". The answer to the original question would probably still qualify as "no", though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand that a photon's energy is related to it's wavelength.

But what I am asking is it's energy related to wavelength because we are only looking at a 3 dimensional cross section of 4 dimensions.

In 4 dimensions photons do not have different energies?

I'm not sure what you mean by "in 4 dimensional space-time." Are you talking about four-vectors? If so, then in a sense yes, they all have a magnitude zero four-momentum:

 

[latex]p^\mu=(E,\mathbf{p})[/latex]

 

with [math]p^\mu p_\mu = 0[/math]. They also have an associated wave-vector which contains the information about the frequency and wavelength of the light: [math]k^\mu = (\omega, \mathbf{k})[/math]. Since [math]p^\mu = \hbar k^\mu[/math], the magnitude of the wave-vector is also zero: [math]k^\mu k_\mu =0[/math].

 

EDIT: I'm not sure what's going on with the LaTeX, but that </span> thing shouldn't be there.

Edited by ydoaPs
fixed LaTeX
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he's referencing the idea to unify the wave-particle theory... How do particles move in a 2 dimensional wave in three dimensional space? If they're traveling in a helical path (spinning while moving). Thus, a higher wavelength could be considered to have more energy even though the particle is massless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he's referencing the idea to unify the wave-particle theory... How do particles move in a 2 dimensional wave in three dimensional space? If they're traveling in a helical path (spinning while moving). Thus, a higher wavelength could be considered to have more energy even though the particle is massless.

 

There's no helical path. As I said, it's intrinsic angular momentum. There is no physical motion associated with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What gets called "spin" isn't actually spin.

If you calculate the tangential velocity for an electron based on its "spin" it turns out to be faster than light (or so I was told, I never checked the maths).

 

It's a problem the particle physicists subsequently avoided by calling these properties things like "charm", "colour" and "flavour".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It's a problem the particle physicists subsequently avoided by calling these properties things like "charm", "colour" and "flavour".

 

OTOH, not really. The color interaction has nothing to do with actual color (which has no meaning at that scale), and quarks really don't have flavors. It's book-keeping. For charge there's - and +, which can add to zero for a neutral system. For a ternary system, it's more complicated. In the system that was devised, colors have to add up to white, and that model reflects the actual behavior that we see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have 4 dimensions,then it's possible to create a model of an object/wave that can deposit energy at different wave lengths in 3 dimensional space?

t2 = r2 - x2

There are 2 points when t=0.

(x-r,y=0,z=0,t=0) and (x+r,y=0,z=0,t=0)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have 4 dimensions,then it's possible to create a model of an object/wave that can deposit energy at different wave lengths in 3 dimensional space?

t2 = r2 - x2

There are 2 points when t=0.

(x-r,y=0,z=0,t=0) and (x+r,y=0,z=0,t=0)

 

Possible, probably, but EM waves don't do that. E x B = S where S is the Poynting vector

 

IOW, the direction of energy propagation, E and B fields are all mutually perpendicular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do all photons have equal amounts of energy in 4 dimensional space-time?

They all travel at the speed of light.

 

What matters to us is how frequently they cross through our bit of 3 dimensional space?

 

The energy of a photon is given by [math]E=pc[/math], thus photons with different momentum will have different energy. This is similar to what happen with 1000 kg cars. Their energy is given by [math]E=(1/2000) p^2[/math], thus cars with different momentum will have different energy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The energy of a photon is given by [math]E=pc[/math], thus photons with different momentum will have different energy. This is similar to what happen with 1000 kg cars. Their energy is given by [math]E=(1/2000) p^2[/math], thus cars with different momentum will have different energy.

In which way would a photon change it's momentum,it can't change it's velocity and it can't change it,s mass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In which way would a photon change it's momentum,it can't change it's velocity and it can't change it,s mass.

 

A change in frequency, which implies a change in energy and thus momentum. (It's not actually that a photon can change its energy, but that two photons can have different energy)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A change in frequency, which implies a change in energy and thus momentum. (It's not actually that a photon can change its energy, but that two photons can have different energy)

But you can change a photons frequency without destroying it.

Edited by derek w
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I don't think you can.

You can move towards or away from a source of light.

And a photons frequency would change if it was headed towards or away from a mass(the greater the mass the greater the change).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can move towards or away from a source of light.

And a photons frequency would change if it was headed towards or away from a mass(the greater the mass the greater the change).

 

No, that doesn't count. You have changed your reference frame when you do that; energy is not an invariant quantity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.