Science Forums: The universe at near 0 Kelvin - Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology to computer science, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!
  
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help  registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Create a ScienceForums.Net Blog!
Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

The universe at near 0 Kelvin Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is online  dimreepr 


Atom
Please move if this is in the wrong forum.

Quote



Although the temperature of the Universe will continue to drop, it will approach zero but never reach it. The energy that is in the temperature will spread out thinner and thinner, but since that energy is non-zero, no matter what volume it is spread over, the average is never exactly zero, just smaller and smaller.

Dr. Eric Christian



When/if the universe reaches the critical temperature for the Bose-Einstein condensate to form, what effects would this have to observation of the universe?


0

#2 User is online  swansont 


Icon
Shaken, not Stirred

View Postdimreepr, on 10 March 2012 - 03:16 PM, said:

When/if the universe reaches the critical temperature for the Bose-Einstein condensate to form, what effects would this have to observation of the universe?


BEC is a matter of density as well as temperature.
Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum

Stop failing the Turing test!

My SFN blog: Swans on Tea

To release the hounds, click the [+] sign ->
0

#3 User is online  dimreepr 


Atom

View Postswansont, on 10 March 2012 - 03:38 PM, said:

BEC is a matter of density as well as temperature.



I see so it would never form universally?

This post has been edited by dimreepr: 10 March 2012 - 04:26 PM

0

#4 User is online  swansont 


Icon
Shaken, not Stirred

View Postdimreepr, on 10 March 2012 - 04:23 PM, said:

I see so it would never form universally?


You need a density orders of magnitude higher than the current average density of matter and a temperature orders of magnitude colder, and the way you get colder is via expansion, which lowers the density.
Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum

Stop failing the Turing test!

My SFN blog: Swans on Tea

To release the hounds, click the [+] sign ->
0

#5 User is online  dimreepr 


Atom

View Postswansont, on 10 March 2012 - 11:33 PM, said:

You need a density orders of magnitude higher than the current average density of matter and a temperature orders of magnitude colder, and the way you get colder is via expansion, which lowers the density.



Ok but does this preclude the chance that some areas of space could achieve the required density and temperature to form BEC and if so would this region of space be big enough for observation (given were about to observe) or would the density create a higher temperature and thus inhibit the formation?

(edit) I guess I've answered myself here so don't worry about a reply.

This post has been edited by dimreepr: 11 March 2012 - 06:48 PM

0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users