Science Forums: GR Derivation - Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology to computer science, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!
  
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help  registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Create a ScienceForums.Net Blog!
Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

GR Derivation Rate Topic: -----

#1 ydoaPs 


just lost the game
Does anyone know any good derivations for the Einstein Field Equations?
"Our integrity sells for so little, but it is all we really have. It is the very last inch of us. But within that inch we are free."-Valerie(V for Vendetta)

‎"Scientism" is the pejorative those who believe in magic give to Empiricism so they can pretend making stuff up is on equal footing with Science.

Don't forget to follow me on facebook.
If you like my post, please show me by clicking the green plus ------->
1

#2 ajb 


Icon
Physics Expert
You can derive the field equations from the Einstein--Hilbert action.

Though this may not really answer your question, you now want to know why use the Einstein--Hilbert action?

Really this comes form a few assumptions. The first thing is that the action must be a functional of the metric and the Levi-Civita connection associated with this metric. (Well you can in fact treat them as being independent as in the Palatini formulation).

The conditions are

  • The action must contain no more than two derivatives.
  • The action must be invariant under general coordinate transformations.


The first condition really comes from a bit of hindsight. If we want to think about a quantum theory of gravity then we will not want ghosts to potentially destroy unitary. So we make the assumption of no higher derivatives. The second condition is really saying that the action is scaler.

Imposing these conditions yields the Hilbert--Einstein action with the possibility of adding a cosmological constant.

S \propto \int d^{4}x \sqrt{-g} (R + \Lambda).

The overall numerical constants are fixed by requiring the theory reduce to Newtonian gravity in appropriate limits. In essence this is the simplest action built from curvature tensors. Thus general relativity is kind of the simplest gravity theory we can have!

If one relaxes the condition that we have at most second order derivatives then further curvature terms can be added to the action. Such theories are known as higher derivative theories. These are studied, usually in relation to string theory modifications to gravity, but they are interesting in their own right.

So this is pure gravity. Now you add the matter terms and look at the appropriate Euler-Lagrange equations and you end up with the Einstein field equations.

(It is more fiddly that I suggest, try and fill in the gaps!)
"In physics you don't have to go around making trouble for yourself - nature does it for you" Frank Wilczek.

My homepage.
1

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users