Science Forums: trying to understand Quantum Teleportation (QT) ? - Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology to computer science, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!
  
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help  registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Create a ScienceForums.Net Blog!
Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

trying to understand Quantum Teleportation (QT) ? Rate Topic: -----

#1 Widdekind 


Atom
From wikipedia, I understand the following re: QT:

  • an entangled pair of particles is generated, sharing some property, e.g. spin, such that s1* + s2* = S12
  • the sender transmits the 'second' particle, to a remote receiver
  • the sender entangles the 'first' particle, with an 'information' particle; and makes a measurement, of their combination, causing wave-function collapse, s1*,s2* --> s1, s2, s.t. i + s1 = Si1
  • er go, the sender now knows, the quantum state, of the 'second' particle, at the remote receiver, s2 = S12 - s1 = S12 - (Si1 - i) = i + (S12-Si1)
  • the sender transmits the 'offset factor', S12-Si1, to the remote receiver
  • the remote receiver 'subtracts off' that 'offset factor', from their 'second' particle, to recover the 'information', s2 - (S12-Si1) = i

I understand, that QT can effect communications encryption. For, when transmitted, s2 carries no meaningful information. And, if transmitted, the 'offset factor' S12-Si1 is meaningful information, but exclusively in application, to but one quantum 'particle', in all of the entire universe, i.e. s2, presumably possessed by the intended remote receiver. Er go, potential eavesdroppers would only intercept "meaningless undifferentiated quantum randomness", or "meaningless-for-them quantum certainty". Is this simple picture accurate (if approximate) ?
0

#2 questionposter 


Primate

View PostWiddekind, on 17 January 2012 - 08:08 AM, said:

From wikipedia, I understand the following re: QT:

  • an entangled pair of particles is generated, sharing some property, e.g. spin, such that s1* + s2* = S12
  • the sender transmits the 'second' particle, to a remote receiver
  • the sender entangles the 'first' particle, with an 'information' particle; and makes a measurement,


That's where it ends.
0

#3 Widdekind 


Atom
what are you saying, "that's where the information has been QT'd" ?

This post has been edited by Widdekind: 18 January 2012 - 08:08 AM

0

#4 questionposter 


Primate

View PostWiddekind, on 18 January 2012 - 08:08 AM, said:

what are you saying, "that's where the information has been QT'd" ?


You can't measure an entangled system and continue to observe it's effects, unless your dealing with something like liquid helium.
0

#5 Widdekind 


Atom
'measurement' induces a 'wave-function collapse', "conforming" the collapsing wave-functions into certain states. The QT process exploits QE, to "conform" a wave-function, into a known state, without directly measuring-and-disturbing that state.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users