Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!
|
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.
|
|
| Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse | |
Smiling (Psychology)
#1 13 January 2012 - 09:46 PM
- Posts: 1 | Joined: 13-January 12
Reply
#2 19 January 2012 - 06:16 PM
Neob91, on 13 January 2012 - 09:46 PM, said:
That's a good question. "Smiling" seems to come naturally to less advanced people. To scientific people, smiling is more of a deliberate act.
In my youth, I kept a kind of diary, to record discoveries about life. One of these discoveries was: "It is of the utmost importance to smile at people". Why that should be important, I never really understood. But it's something one has to do.
Personally, I'd prefer to communicate with another person, without having to distort my lips in an upward curve. Such gestures remind one of the lip movements exhibited by chimpanzees. However, as some humans are only talking chimps, it's necessary for homo scienticus to placate them by atavistic smiling.
The best advice I can give is this - when giving a false smile - also wrinkle the skin round your eyes - this makes the smile look genuine!
- Posts: 245 | Joined: 17-April 11
Reply
#3 19 January 2012 - 07:30 PM
Dekan, on 19 January 2012 - 06:16 PM, said:
However, as some humans are only talking chimps, it's necessary for homo scienticus to placate them by atavistic smiling.
Perhaps you should read - http://scienceray.co...mpanzees-smile/
To quote from the link -
- Posts: 808 | Joined: 07-February 10
Reply
#4 20 January 2012 - 02:46 PM
TonyMcC, on 19 January 2012 - 07:30 PM, said:
Thanks Tony, for the link. From reading it, I see that the anthropoid grin, and its toned-down version, the smile, originally displayed fear. That makes sense - a baring of the teeth when fearing possible danger - "Look what big strong biting teeth I've got - don't dare attack me!"
It could explain why humans have evolved to smile at each other. By a mutual smile, we convey to each other: "We're both strong, with big teeth. We're evenly matched. So fighting will get us nowhere. Let's be friends!"
But doesn't this reveal, that the whole "smiling" business is a deplorable hangover from primitive times. In modern times, surely we can dispense with it?
I personally find very bothersome to keep having to smile at people. But good strategy can produce worthwhile results - to reiterate the advice I originally gave to Neob91:
"When smiling - make sure you crinkle your eyes as well - this fools 'em good."
- Posts: 245 | Joined: 17-April 11
Reply
#5 20 January 2012 - 04:30 PM
Dekan, on 20 January 2012 - 02:46 PM, said:
Geesh. No wonder you have such a hard time expressing joy. I'm not sure an inability to smile is the source of your problem. It sounds like a symptom of something a bit deeper.
~~~ Pale Blue Dot ~~~
"[Time] is one of those concepts that is profoundly resistant to a simple definition."
~C. Sagan
http://thescienceforum.orgDid you like this post? Let me know about it by clicking the (+) sign here -->
- Posts: 11,946 | Joined: 02-August 07
Reply
#6 20 January 2012 - 04:50 PM
Dekan, on 20 January 2012 - 02:46 PM, said:
But doesn't this reveal, that the whole "smiling" business is a deplorable hangover from primitive times. In modern times, surely we can dispense with it?
"When smiling - make sure you crinkle your eyes as well - this fools 'em good."
Isn't most of our instinctive behaviour some sort of hangover from primitive times? I see these hungover factors as aids to social living. Without them we could easily find ourselves isolated and "lonely in the midst of a crowd". Can you explain why I smile with pleasure when I meet my children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren?
.
This post has been edited by TonyMcC: 20 January 2012 - 05:01 PM
- Posts: 808 | Joined: 07-February 10
Reply
#7 20 January 2012 - 04:55 PM
Dekan, on 20 January 2012 - 02:46 PM, said:
Apparently not. Even YOU put a smilie into your own post #2.
~~~ Pale Blue Dot ~~~
"[Time] is one of those concepts that is profoundly resistant to a simple definition."
~C. Sagan
http://thescienceforum.orgDid you like this post? Let me know about it by clicking the (+) sign here -->
- Posts: 11,946 | Joined: 02-August 07
Reply
#8 21 January 2012 - 09:21 PM
TonyMcC, on 20 January 2012 - 04:50 PM, said:
.
You're right about instinctive hangovers. That could explain why you smile at the sight of human infants. It's because you see them (instinctively) as potential food. However, when the infant smiles back at you, its smile instinctively deters you from attempting to eat it.
Why else do babies instinctively smile at their parents? I bet any baby which didn't smile and gurgle with apparent pleasure, when confronted by its parent looming over it, would soon get eaten, or chucked out of the nest. At least, in primitive times.
In modern times, these instinctual reactions ought to consigned to the dustbin of history.
Shouldn't we look forward to a world, where humans can meet and exchange rational data, without crude instinctive facial signals?
- Posts: 245 | Joined: 17-April 11
Reply
#9 21 January 2012 - 09:47 PM
Dekan, on 21 January 2012 - 09:21 PM, said:
You already have it - its known as a forum on the internet. In fact you have had that possibility since the written word became common. As for me and,I believe, for most people seeing the face and its expressions is a valuable component of communication. I have a feeling you are pulling my leg - or as a well known veteran tennis player might say "You can't be serious!"
- Posts: 808 | Joined: 07-February 10
Reply
#10 21 January 2012 - 09:51 PM
iNow, on 20 January 2012 - 04:30 PM, said:
Yes, it's a symptom of a wish. That the world, was made up of libraries and laboratories. With calm serious people, rationally discussing
scientific questions.
That would be true joy. Without facial grimacing!
- Posts: 245 | Joined: 17-April 11
Reply
#11 22 January 2012 - 04:28 AM
~~~ Pale Blue Dot ~~~
"[Time] is one of those concepts that is profoundly resistant to a simple definition."
~C. Sagan
http://thescienceforum.orgDid you like this post? Let me know about it by clicking the (+) sign here -->
- Posts: 11,946 | Joined: 02-August 07
Reply
#12 24 January 2012 - 03:59 PM
iNow, on 22 January 2012 - 04:28 AM, said:
Do you need to be told? A scientist, or person who's interested in science, is truly joyful, by finding out something for the first time. Probably.
May I give a quote from Leon Lederman's excellent popular book "The God Particle". The bit where he found out parity violation was true:
"By now the machine had come up to its best intensity... zero degrees was reading 2,560, 180 degrees was reading 1,222. On a purely statistical basis this was overwhelming.... my breathing was becoming difficult, my palms were wet, my heartbeat accelerated. I felt lightheaded - many (not all!) of the symptoms of sexual intercourse. This was big stuff...new information about the world...Physics was changed."
Could that justify an argument, that Science is only a kind of Freudian substitute for sexual intercourse?
I hope not! But as we still feel a need to keep smiling at each other, who knows what really motivates us to construct things like cyclotrons and the LHC?
This post has been edited by Dekan: 24 January 2012 - 04:01 PM
- Posts: 245 | Joined: 17-April 11
Reply
#13 26 January 2012 - 07:34 AM
Dekan, on 21 January 2012 - 09:21 PM, said:
The grimace may rather be associated with "vulnerability," which in certain (primeval?) circumstances requires a fight/flight response, but in other (social?) circumstances can be an invitation to cooperate.
~
It's time for the next step in our evolutionary symbiosis with fire
--in order to manage our domain everlastingly.
- Posts: 189 | Joined: 19-May 11
Reply
#14 26 January 2012 - 09:28 PM
Essay, on 26 January 2012 - 07:34 AM, said:
The grimace may rather be associated with "vulnerability," which in certain (primeval?) circumstances requires a fight/flight response, but in other (social?) circumstances can be an invitation to cooperate.
~
A thought-provoking post - thanks! "Vulnerability", is a good word for what I was trying to get at.
Suppose you grimace at a person, by drawing back your lips, in a smile which displays aggressive biting teeth. That's clearly a threatening gesture. It sends the message: "Submit to me - or I'll bite you - you're vulnerable to my strong teeth".
However, what if the other person opens their lips with a similar, alarmingly well-fanged smile? Then your threat is matched.
So Mutual Deterrence is established. A Balance of Toothsome Terror. You both recognise your "vulnerability" to dentitional attack. This leads to peaceful co-existence and guardedly grinning co-operation. Isn't that how history works? Instead of teeth, substitute American Minuteman III missiles and Russian SS-18's, and you got the way most humans behave.
It all comes back to that horrible deceitful smile!
Why can't we be unemotional and straight-faced all the time? Wouldn't it be a huge relief?
- Posts: 245 | Joined: 17-April 11
Reply
#15 30 January 2012 - 12:11 AM
- Posts: 7 | Joined: 13-November 11
Reply

Help
Sign In »
Register Now!













