Science Forums: trying to understand Strong Force interactions ? - Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology to computer science, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!
  
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help  registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Create a ScienceForums.Net Blog!
Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

trying to understand Strong Force interactions ? Rate Topic: -----

#1 Widdekind 


Atom
According to Nambu's book Quarks, quark triplets, in baryons, are best imagined, as connected together, via string-like bonds, to a common center:

Posted Image

Now, I understand, that quarks "extrude" glue, which "carries away" the quarks' colors. For example, a red quark q_r exists in a super-position:

<q_r> \approx \frac{1}{3}q_r : g_{\bar{r}r} + \frac{1}{3}q_y : g_{\bar{y}r} + \frac{1}{3}q_b : g_{\bar{b}r}

\approx q_W : g_{\bar{W}r}

 = q_W : g_{Br}

I.e. the quark essentially "blanches", into a "white" super-position state, wherein the quark is equally likely to be "red", "yellow" or "blue", i.e. the quark "is as much one color as any other", and so is effectively "white". Likewise, the anti-colors, of the gluons emitted, being "anti-red (green)", "anti-yellow (purple)", or "anti-blue (orange)", also sum, in super-position, to "anti-white (black)":

Posted Image

Thus, three such quarks, in a color-neutral triplet, in a baryon, are effectively in the state:

<q_r> + <q_y> + <q_b> \approx q_W : g_{Br} + q_W : g_{By} + q_W : g_{Bb}


Posted Image

When gluon bonds "break", they "rip" at the "juncture", between the anti-color & color:

g_{\bar{c}c} \rightarrow \bar{q}_{\bar{c}} + q_c

So, assuming spherical symmetry, the structure of a nucleon, per this picture, is a little like that of our earth:

  • White "crust" -- color-neutral "skin" of "bag" in "bag model", wherein quarks emerge (when glue bonds break)
  • Black "mantle" -- anti-color-neutral interior of "bag", wherein anti-quarks emerge (when glue bonds break)
  • White "core" -- color-neutral center of "bag", wherein original quark triplet resides, "extruding" glue

Posted Image

If so, then quarks "greet each other at arms length", "extruding" their colors into gluons, and "shaking hands" ~1fm away, not "hugging" up close. Is that what Nambu implied, in his book ? If so, then quarks in nucleons, are a little like "bungee bulls" at amusement parks:

Posted Image

Posted Image

Is such a scenario what accounts for "asymptotic freedom", wherein quarks do not Strongly interact, deep in the central "core" regions of nucleons, but rather only when they are "jostled" nearer to the "surface", i.e. "skin of the bag" ??
0

#2 Widdekind 


Atom
The RHIC 'particle' collider, at BNL, has smashed gold nuclei together, thereby generating intra-nuclear temperatures, of 4 TK \approx 400 MeV, as measured by the "color of light" emitted, from the collision region, immediately after impact. Prima facie, nuclei, and individual nucleons, can & do have internal temperatures. Indeed, 4 TK temperatures correspond, to the "dressed" quark masses, inside nucleons, i.e. m_{q,eff} \approx \frac{1}{3} m_P. Perhaps quarks, gluons, and virtual quark-antiquark pairs, inside nucleons, equilibrate to the same ambient temperatures, of the nucleon's environment (and "boil out" of nucleons at temperatures \ge 4 TK? For example, quarks carry EM charge, and so they could interact, with ions & electrons, in astrophysical plasmas. Perhaps the nucleons, within the gas & dust, in deep space, have equilibrated, to \approx 3K ??

This post has been edited by Widdekind: 11 January 2012 - 03:10 PM

0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users