[TimeContinuum]

Klaynos, on 9 January 2012 - 10:28 PM, said:

That was probably a mistake. If you had continued to read you might have actually understood enough about it to criticise it.



No, it's not a theory, it's a placeholder for an observed effect because we need a name for it. The effect is widely measured and areas of dark matter have been mapped accurately. We know it's there and we know it doesn't interact electromagnetically but it does interact gravitationally.



No, it's observable evidence.

If you even attempted to try and understand my theory, you'd understand that the entangled energy from the stars links them in a kind of gravitational/time-warp sense fixing the MOND theory and eliminating the Dark Matter theory. You assume I don't read all about these theories, when in fact I have, but have chosen to dismiss the unobservable and have instead re-understood relativity in a non-classical sense. And I have discovered, that certain misinterpretations in relativity are factors towards our current gross misunderstanding.

You say it's not a theory, but go on to call it a placeholder. Really?! How is that any different??? I got a placeholder: GOD. Prove me wrong. You can't. So why don't you quit being so ignorant and accept that dark-matter is a theory. You can't just design a new element "magic" to explain what you don't understand. You can say God is responsible for our observational anomalies and you end up with the same result - Bad science.

This post has been edited by TimeContinuum: 10 January 2012 - 04:13 AM

[swansont]

TimeContinuum, on 10 January 2012 - 04:09 AM, said:

If you even attempted to try and understand my theory, you'd understand that the entangled energy from the stars links them in a kind of gravitational/time-warp sense fixing the MOND theory and eliminating the Dark Matter theory. You assume I don't read all about these theories, when in fact I have, but have chosen to dismiss the unobservable and have instead re-understood relativity in a non-classical sense. And I have discovered, that certain misinterpretations in relativity are factors towards our current gross misunderstanding.

You say it's not a theory, but go on to call it a placeholder. Really?! How is that any different??? I got a placeholder: GOD. Prove me wrong. You can't. So why don't you quit being so ignorant and accept that dark-matter is a theory. You can't just design a new element "magic" to explain what you don't understand. You can say God is responsible for our observational anomalies and you end up with the same result - Bad science.

1) I dont see where you've presented anything resembling a theory to critique, and
2) People know that dark matter is a theory, but these are people who understand what theory means in a scientific context.