Science Forums: sq (2gh) - Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology to computer science, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!
  
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help  registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Create a ScienceForums.Net Blog!
Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

sq (2gh) checking that it's right Rate Topic: -----

#1 morgsboi 


Atom
Hello, just checking that this is right before I put it in my extension work. Is this the correct formula to find the velocity of an object falling without counting air resistance?

mgh = 1/2 m^2
divide both sides by m
gh = 1/2 v^2
v = sq (2gh)
0

#2 User is online  Cap'n Refsmmat 


Icon
Mr. Wizard
You forgot a v in your first equation. It should be 1/2 m v^2. But yes, that'll tell you the velocity of an object that has fallen a distance h after being released from rest.
Cap'n Refsmmat
SFN Administrator

Get in the chatroom!
0

#3 morgsboi 


Atom

View PostCap, on 1 January 2012 - 03:51 PM, said:

You forgot a v in your first equation. It should be 1/2 m v^2. But yes, that'll tell you the velocity of an object that has fallen a distance h after being released from rest.


Oh yes, so I did. I wrote it down on my notes before I put it on here though. Thanks for the confirmation. ;)
0

#4 DrRocket 


Primate

View Postmorgsboi, on 1 January 2012 - 06:31 PM, said:

Oh yes, so I did. I wrote it down on my notes before I put it on here though. Thanks for the confirmation. ;)


That equation, as corrected, is just an application of conservation of energy.

Note that this is not really mathematics. It is physics.

You can know the name of a bird in all the languages of the world, but when you're finished, you'll know absolutely nothing whatever about the bird... -- Richard P. Feynman
0

#5 morgsboi 


Atom

View PostDrRocket, on 12 January 2012 - 02:55 AM, said:

That equation, as corrected, is just an application of conservation of energy.

Note that this is not really mathematics. It is physics.

It's for physics work.
0

#6 User is online  swansont 


Icon
Shaken, not Stirred
One check you should get in the habit of doing is to look at the units. That doesn't guarantee it's right, but if the units don't match, you know you have made a mistake. (Here, of course, the units are the same because the equation is valid)
Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum

Stop failing the Turing test!

My SFN blog: Swans on Tea

To release the hounds, click the [+] sign ->
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users