Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!
|
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.
|
|
| Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse | |
Page 1 of 1
Random Questions all your questions professionally answered
#2 29 December 2011 - 09:34 PM
What is a good strategy to derive physiologically relevant answers from omics based experiments. More specifically what would be the ideal workflow to reduce false-positive detections in quantitative analyses on the one hand and derive predictive models on the other.
Also what do you think are the implications of population averaging in proteomic samples?
Also what do you think are the implications of population averaging in proteomic samples?
- Posts: 3,504 | Joined: 20-October 04
Reply
#3 12 January 2012 - 04:15 PM
CharonY, on 29 December 2011 - 09:34 PM, said:
What is a good strategy to derive physiologically relevant answers from omics based experiments. More specifically what would be the ideal workflow to reduce false-positive detections in quantitative analyses on the one hand and derive predictive models on the other.
Also what do you think are the implications of population averaging in proteomic samples?
Also what do you think are the implications of population averaging in proteomic samples?
So much for "all your questions professionally answered"....
A fencing instructor named Fisk
In duels was terribly brisk
So much that in action
The Fitzgerald contraction
Reduced his foil to a disk
Like all good science, I pose more questions than I answer
In duels was terribly brisk
So much that in action
The Fitzgerald contraction
Reduced his foil to a disk
Like all good science, I pose more questions than I answer
Spoiler
- Posts: 635 | Joined: 01-December 11
Reply
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1

Help
Sign In »
Register Now!










