Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!
|
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.
|
|
| Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse | |
Does Listerine have any side effect?
#2 14 December 2011 - 10:41 PM
Newbies_Kid, on 14 December 2011 - 04:30 AM, said:
I believe some medical scientists have discovered that the isopropyl alcohol used in mouth washes may be a carcinogen.
Quote
- Posts: 574 | Joined: 17-July 11
Reply
#3 15 December 2011 - 01:03 AM
Greg Boyles, on 14 December 2011 - 10:41 PM, said:
Your source may be a bit suspect, since it's repeated in many herbal remedy promotion sites.
From OSHA: http://www.osha.gov/...on.html
Quote
Which still means there may be risks, but manufacturing processes are correctable.
- Posts: 9,304 | Joined: 26-April 04
Reply
#4 15 December 2011 - 04:26 AM
- Posts: 177 | Joined: 25-March 09
Reply
#6 15 December 2011 - 08:30 AM
Benzoic acid is something you find in food all the time. It's used as a food preservative. I'm not entirely sure why it is in there, though possibly it is one of the other antiseptic ingredients. The ethanol is needed in order to dissolve that as well as all the other antiseptic agents, which are, IIRC, terpenes and won't dissolve in water.
- Posts: 1,077 | Joined: 09-January 11
Reply
#7 15 December 2011 - 07:22 PM
Greg Boyles, on 14 December 2011 - 10:41 PM, said:
I believe that listerine (generally) uses ethanol. That's also widely known to be toxic, but it leaves me wondering why you seem to be worrying about the wrong chemical.
They also do an alcohol free version.
- Posts: 4,895 | Joined: 24-February 06
Reply
#8 15 December 2011 - 09:12 PM
John Cuthber, on 15 December 2011 - 07:22 PM, said:
They also do an alcohol free version.
Not that I have ever looked at the active ingredients, but I seem to remember a news item some time ago about the fact that the isopropyl alcohol in mouth washes may be carcinogenic.
But no doubt some products use isopropyl alcohol and others use ethanol.
Ethanol, or more precisely its oxidation product acetaldehyde, is also believed to be carcinogenic.
Recent studies have indicated that there is no safe level of consumption of alcoholic beverages.
- Posts: 574 | Joined: 17-July 11
Reply
#9 15 December 2011 - 10:04 PM
Perhaps you should have.
"But no doubt some products use isopropyl alcohol"
Name one.
Consumption of alcohol is known to be a risk factor for (at least some ) cancers.
However it is also known that consumption of alcohol in moderation is associated with longer life than being tee total.
As far as I'm aware, no study has been done on gargling and spitting it out.
Can you cite one?
"Recent studies have indicated that there is no safe level of consumption of alcoholic beverages."
Studies on alcohol and health are notoriously difficult to do and these seem to be trying to prove a negative- which is a logical impossibility.
Can you cite a reference for them please?
- Posts: 4,895 | Joined: 24-February 06
Reply
#10 15 December 2011 - 10:13 PM
Greg Boyles, on 15 December 2011 - 09:12 PM, said:
Can you substantiate that with some links please? Older studies show that a glass of wine a day is actually good for you.
- Posts: 1,629 | Joined: 31-October 05
Reply
#11 15 December 2011 - 10:23 PM
John Cuthber, on 15 December 2011 - 10:04 PM, said:
Perhaps you should have.
"But no doubt some products use isopropyl alcohol"
Name one.
Consumption of alcohol is known to be a risk factor for (at least some ) cancers.
However it is also known that consumption of alcohol in moderation is associated with longer life than being tee total.
As far as I'm aware, no study has been done on gargling and spitting it out.
Can you cite one?
"Recent studies have indicated that there is no safe level of consumption of alcoholic beverages."
Studies on alcohol and health are notoriously difficult to do and these seem to be trying to prove a negative- which is a logical impossibility.
Can you cite a reference for them please?
The alcohol in Listerine is ethanol, unsurprisingly. 21.6% per the MSDS
http://www.discounto...703MSDS1354.pdf
I recommend gargling and spitting out Listerine.
If one intends to swallow ethanol there are more palatable forms. I recommend a nice sour mash Bourbon, a good Scotch or a nice Merlot.
Gargliong isopropanol is not recommended. Neither is drinking it. Ditto for methanol (which is why good moonshiners discard the top cut).
- Posts: 1,571 | Joined: 09-February 11
Reply
#12 15 December 2011 - 10:46 PM
John Cuthber, on 15 December 2011 - 10:04 PM, said:
Perhaps you should have.
"But no doubt some products use isopropyl alcohol"
Name one.
Consumption of alcohol is known to be a risk factor for (at least some ) cancers.
However it is also known that consumption of alcohol in moderation is associated with longer life than being tee total.
As far as I'm aware, no study has been done on gargling and spitting it out.
Can you cite one?
"Recent studies have indicated that there is no safe level of consumption of alcoholic beverages."
Studies on alcohol and health are notoriously difficult to do and these seem to be trying to prove a negative- which is a logical impossibility.
Can you cite a reference for them please?
"Isopropyl alcohol is oxidized by the liver into acetone by alcohol dehydrogenase. "
So medical drug authorities would not allow its use in mouth washes given this.
Either I misunderstood the news item or the reporter got it wrong - it was some years ago and I only vaguely recollect the details.
Found a mention of methyl alcohol (probably on small amount) sometimes being used in mouth washes - that would be rather dangerous surely.
Thankyou for instigating me to correct a misconception that I had picked up by the way.
Actually on further reading, I probably got isopropyl alcohol confused with chlorohexidine (as far as mount washes go) as both are common antiseptics used in a wide range of products.
http://www.drugs.com...orhexidine.html
Chlorohexidine is known to be carcinogenic beyond a certain dose.
doG, on 15 December 2011 - 10:13 PM, said:
As with anything in life there are both advantages and disadvantages.
I believe various components in red wine have antioxidant properties and confer a health benefit, however the high alcohol content also confers a detriment apparently.
This was also in a prominent news report on Australian television, by a credible medical scientists/doctor, that I do remember quite well as I was surprised for the same reason as you.
Here is a link for you: http://en.wikipedia....ohol_and_cancer. You can take it from here if you wish.
Interesting.....so there is a segment of the population that is particularly at risk from alcohol induced cancer.
Quote
This post has been edited by Greg Boyles: 15 December 2011 - 10:36 PM
- Posts: 574 | Joined: 17-July 11
Reply
#14 15 December 2011 - 11:50 PM
CharonY, on 15 December 2011 - 11:33 PM, said:
Perhaps it is not so much the chlorohexidine as the perhaps unavoidable impurities in it:
http://www.mendeley....ne-digluconate/
- Posts: 574 | Joined: 17-July 11
Reply
#15 16 December 2011 - 12:42 AM
Greg Boyles, on 15 December 2011 - 10:46 PM, said:
As with anything in life there are both advantages and disadvantages.
I believe various components in red wine have antioxidant properties and confer a health benefit, however the high alcohol content also confers a detriment apparently.
This was also in a prominent news report on Australian television, by a credible medical scientists/doctor, that I do remember quite well as I was surprised for the same reason as you.
Here is a link for you: http://en.wikipedia....ohol_and_cancer. You can take it from here if you wish.
Interesting.....so there is a segment of the population that is particularly at risk from alcohol induced cancer.
But that's not what you said. You said there was no safe amount of alcohol.
- Posts: 631 | Joined: 21-July 10
Reply
#16 16 December 2011 - 01:07 AM
Greg Boyles, on 15 December 2011 - 09:12 PM, said:
Greg Boyles, on 15 December 2011 - 10:46 PM, said:
Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnttttttttt!!!! Wrong answer. You said, "Recent studies have indicated that there is no safe level of consumption of alcoholic beverages." Not only does your link not support your claim, it doesn't even address it. Sorry, no winner this time, please try again.
- Posts: 1,629 | Joined: 31-October 05
Reply
#17 16 December 2011 - 06:58 AM
Greg,
did you say anything that was both correct and relevant?
(Please note that the OP probably does not have cancer)
- Posts: 4,895 | Joined: 24-February 06
Reply
#18 16 December 2011 - 08:40 AM
John Cuthber, on 16 December 2011 - 06:58 AM, said:
Greg,
did you say anything that was both correct and relevant?
(Please note that the OP probably does not have cancer)
I have recanted this already after reading further about isopropyl alcohol, about mouth washes and about chlorohexidine. My recollection of the details of the matter was simply incorrect.
But it does not change the fact that medical authorities now regard alcohol containing mouth washes carcinogenic and that there is no safe level of alcohol consumption in general.
Please refer to the links below.
This is obviously the medical warning I remember seeing.
But it is related to the ethanol content, with no mention of chlorohexidine
From 2009....
http://www.dailytele...i-1111118530255
Quote
Their review, published in the Dental Journal of Australia, concludes there is now ``sufficient evidence'' that "alcohol-containing mouthwashes contribute to the increased risk of development of oral cancer''.
The ethanol in mouthwash is thought to allow cancer-causing substances to permeate the lining of the mouth more easily and cause harm.
Acetaldehyde, a toxic by-product of alcohol that may accumulate in the oral cavity when swished around the mouth, is also believed to be carcinogenic.
Listerine, the nation's biggest-selling mouthwash and a brand endorsed by the Australian Dental Association (ADA), contains as much as 26 per cent alcohol.
And regarding there being no safe level of alcohol consumption.....
http://www.abc.net.a...ed/1479126.html
Quote
doG, on 16 December 2011 - 01:07 AM, said:
Sure about that?
Quote
http://www.sciencefo...209&qpid=644986
Quote
Consider if your mouth wash contains both ethanol and chlorohexidine.
There a signficant tax on alcoholic beverages, but doesn't that extend other products that contain ethanol in a drinkable form.
For example the alcoholic essences in the baking isles of supermarkets were being used a cheap source of alcohol by youths but governments have since extended that tax to these items. With the result that the manufactures no longer use ethanol as a base for these essences. Is my recollection correct here?
In which case manufactures of mouth washes would use alternative alcohols if they could. Probably why mouth washes are rather expensive.
This post has been edited by Greg Boyles: 16 December 2011 - 09:40 AM
- Posts: 574 | Joined: 17-July 11
Reply
#19 16 December 2011 - 12:27 PM
Greg Boyles, on 16 December 2011 - 08:40 AM, said:
Yes. You've linked to an opinion in a news report. A review of the actual position of the Cancer Council on alcohol does not support the assertion that there is no safe level. You specifically claimed, "Recent studies have indicated that there is no safe level of consumption of alcoholic beverages." Now, where are those studies?
This post has been edited by doG: 16 December 2011 - 12:27 PM
- Posts: 1,629 | Joined: 31-October 05
Reply
#20 16 December 2011 - 12:51 PM
doG, on 16 December 2011 - 12:27 PM, said:
Fair enough.
htp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/07/100729075015.htm
But on further digging it would appear that this message was specifically concerned with teenage binge drinking, and pregnant woman also, but was being applied more generally.
Another lesson in not taking for granted what is said in the media even when they quote credible souces.
This post has been edited by Greg Boyles: 16 December 2011 - 12:55 PM
- Posts: 574 | Joined: 17-July 11
Reply

Help
Sign In »
Register Now!

















