Science Forums: Is the gravitational constant always constant? - Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology to computer science, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!
  
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help  registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Create a ScienceForums.Net Blog!
Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Is the gravitational constant always constant? time dependency Rate Topic: -----

#1 alpha2cen 


Molecule
We know the gravity well. Then, Is the gravitational constant always constant? Is the present gravitational constant same as that of 10 million years ago ?
0

#2 User is online  swansont 


Icon
Shaken, not Stirred
Currently G is changing no faster than about a part in 10^12 per year

http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0411113 (ArXiv copy of a PRL)

I don't know if you can determine G from remote measurements (which would be old measurements by virtue of d =ct), because we assume the value to deduce the masses. The papers I can find all measure G-dot.
Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum

Stop failing the Turing test!

My SFN blog: Swans on Tea

To release the hounds, click the [+] sign ->
0

#3 Oldman 


Quark
Why G is changing --albeit very slowy? Can general relativity live with changing G?
0

#4 User is online  swansont 


Icon
Shaken, not Stirred

View PostOldman, on 8 December 2011 - 03:15 PM, said:

Why G is changing --albeit very slowy? Can general relativity live with changing G?


Nobody has claimed that it is (in the papers I found). The results are consistent with zero and place an upper bound on how fast it could be changing, which is a function of the experimental accuracy and precision. A claim that G was changing would require that zero be statistically excluded.
Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum

Stop failing the Turing test!

My SFN blog: Swans on Tea

To release the hounds, click the [+] sign ->
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users