Science Forums: Rotating candle... Convection cycle? - Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology to computer science, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!
  
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help  registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Create a ScienceForums.Net Blog!
Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Rotating candle... Convection cycle? Rate Topic: -----

#1 mooeypoo 


Icon
Oh look, Pwnies!
So, I'm looking for fun home experiments in thermo.

I found this video:

I'm going to test it out soon (need to buy a proper candle, I only have the small round scented ones). BUT Before I can put this in a proper official "DIY" kit, I need to know what's going on.

I *think* I know, but I need some help with this. Is this due to a convection cycle or something else? If so, I'm having a bit of difficulty understanding how BOTH sides are lit (which also means they warm up the air above them, respectfully) and yet it rotates, one side goes up while they other goes down.

What's going on here? Is the heat engine more towards the "center" (as in, the center is cold and the tips are hot, so the cycle is really 2 circles from the center) ?

I'm a bit confused. Help?

Thanks!

~mooey
Find a Graduate Program in Physics, Astronomy and Related Fields
(From the American Institute of Physics)

Visit my Science@Home Website: http://www.smarterthanthat.com


If I was helpful, let me know by clicking the [+] sign ->
0

#2 Fuzzwood 


Formerly known as Fswd
I think it involves the relative melting speeds as function of the angle between flame and wax.
1

#3 User is online  swansont 


Icon
Shaken, not Stirred
Could it have to do with the amount of wax? That's my guess. As wax burns/drips off one end it becomes lighter, and the heavier end will fall. I would guess a downward-tilted candle will burn more rapidly, since the flame is closer to the wax.
Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum

Stop failing the Turing test!

My SFN blog: Swans on Tea

To release the hounds, click the [+] sign ->
0

#4 insane_alien 


Genius
I don't think this has anything to do with thermo, more the effects of levers.

the lower end will lose mass faster (this is demonstrated by the lower flame being larger) both by burning and by wax being able to drip off the candle to the work surface.

The higher side loses mass slower because the only flow of wax to the flame is via capillary action and not also gravity feed. alls molten wax will remain part of the candle.

as the lower end burns off mass it becomes lighter causing itself to rise and the other end loses less mass and becomes the heavier side.
Tired of waiting around for a reply on the forums? Use IRC, 'I don't know how' is no longer an excuse.

"Special" Relativity, stupid ideas seem smarter when they come at you really fast.
0

#5 mooeypoo 


Icon
Oh look, Pwnies!

View Postswansont, on 10 June 2011 - 08:22 PM, said:

Could it have to do with the amount of wax? That's my guess. As wax burns/drips off one end it becomes lighter, and the heavier end will fall. I would guess a downward-tilted candle will burn more rapidly, since the flame is closer to the wax.


I thought about that too, like the "Drinking Bird" but if you notice, the candle isn't entirely balanced to begin with... not sure how much wax it loses. Also, at some point it rotates almost all the way through.

My coworker here suggests that the flame that's slightly higher is all-exposed, so it heats the air above it and creates negative pressure layer. The flame that's lower is partially hidden by wax, so there's LESS heated air and hence lesser pressure, and so the candle rotates.

That might be ...
Find a Graduate Program in Physics, Astronomy and Related Fields
(From the American Institute of Physics)

Visit my Science@Home Website: http://www.smarterthanthat.com


If I was helpful, let me know by clicking the [+] sign ->
0

#6 User is online  swansont 


Icon
Shaken, not Stirred

View Postmooeypoo, on 10 June 2011 - 08:29 PM, said:

I thought about that too, like the "Drinking Bird" but if you notice, the candle isn't entirely balanced to begin with... not sure how much wax it loses. Also, at some point it rotates almost all the way through.

It looked to me that the larger rotations happened after you could see drops of wax coming off. The weird thing (to me) is that it rotates past vertical and then reverses direction.

View Postmooeypoo, on 10 June 2011 - 08:29 PM, said:

My coworker here suggests that the flame that's slightly higher is all-exposed, so it heats the air above it and creates negative pressure layer. The flame that's lower is partially hidden by wax, so there's LESS heated air and hence lesser pressure, and so the candle rotates.

That might be ...


If the exposed flame creates a low pressure area above it, the high pressure below would push up on it.
Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum

Stop failing the Turing test!

My SFN blog: Swans on Tea

To release the hounds, click the [+] sign ->
0

#7 rktpro 


Molecule

View Postmooeypoo, on 10 June 2011 - 08:29 PM, said:

I thought about that too, like the "Drinking Bird" but if you notice, the candle isn't entirely balanced to begin with... not sure how much wax it loses. Also, at some point it rotates almost all the way through.

My coworker here suggests that the flame that's slightly higher is all-exposed, so it heats the air above it and creates negative pressure layer. The flame that's lower is partially hidden by wax, so there's LESS heated air and hence lesser pressure, and so the candle rotates.

That might be ...


I somehow agree with him. It seems a fit-able explanation.

And about the complete rotation of the candle, it would occur after sometime. IN 'sometime' period, a lot of less pressure area is created above the apparatus. This would result in a lot of air-flow from down to top, resulting in complete conversion.

But, it won't be the first step. I would happen after some semi circular movements are done.
This could be tested by taking a candle (of small thickness as shown in video ) and applying molten wax on both sides. The molten wax should form a box type formation on the end. Now, before planting more wax, you should thicken the wick by attaching thicker cotton threads.
Now, set the apparatus. If it shows complete cycle early as compared to other candle. Then, our idea would be correct.
Science is fun, math is rum and music is a sticky gum! To kill the zombies, click the [+] button -->
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users