I have to make a working model to demonstrate Roget's Spiral experiment. The apparatus originally used included mercury. But since it applies to all electrolytes ,I would just pour common salt in water and use it. Would it produce spark or not?
Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!
|
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.
|
|
| Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse | |
Page 1 of 1
Roget's Spiral apparatus
#2 6 June 2011 - 03:09 PM
Roget's spiral ---> coil, corkscrew, curlicue, gyration,gyre,helix, screw, whorl
Sorry - I'll get my coat and leave
Sorry - I'll get my coat and leave
A little learning is a dangerous thing; drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, and drinking largely sobers us again.
- Alexander Pope
feel free to click the green [+] ---->
there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, and drinking largely sobers us again.
- Alexander Pope
feel free to click the green [+] ---->
- Posts: 1,751 | Joined: 28-September 10
Reply
#3 26 June 2011 - 09:50 AM
I don't see why it wouldn't work. Along the same lines I've been meaning to build a Faraday motor using salt water instead of mercury.
Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum
Stop failing the Turing test!
My SFN blog: Swans on Tea
To release the hounds, click the [+] sign ->
Stop failing the Turing test!
My SFN blog: Swans on Tea
To release the hounds, click the [+] sign ->
- Posts: 19,633 | Joined: 04-October 03
Reply
#5 26 June 2011 - 04:00 PM
rktpro, on 26 June 2011 - 12:05 PM, said:
One more thing, I am using two cells of 1.5V each. Would they be enough for it? What should be the thickness of coil for it?
The motor I already built used a single battery; the resistance of the wire will give you an indication of the current that will flow. It will be lower than V=IR, because there is also an inductance that adds to the impedance, but the overall behavior will depend on the configuration (e.g. pitch) and the mechanical properties of the coil.
Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum
Stop failing the Turing test!
My SFN blog: Swans on Tea
To release the hounds, click the [+] sign ->
Stop failing the Turing test!
My SFN blog: Swans on Tea
To release the hounds, click the [+] sign ->
- Posts: 19,633 | Joined: 04-October 03
Reply
#6 26 June 2011 - 04:15 PM
I think this is one of those things that should work in theory but might be difficult to get working in practice due to the relatively high resistance of salt water when compared to mercury. I think,for example, that the resistivity of sea water is about 5 million times that of mercury. I don't know what the resistance of a pool of saturated salt solution would be but I can see that very high voltages might have to be used to get enough current to make either device operate (IMO). Anyway, best of luck and worth a try!
- Posts: 808 | Joined: 07-February 10
Reply
#7 27 June 2011 - 01:45 AM
TonyMcC, on 26 June 2011 - 04:15 PM, said:
I think this is one of those things that should work in theory but might be difficult to get working in practice due to the relatively high resistance of salt water when compared to mercury. I think,for example, that the resistivity of sea water is about 5 million times that of mercury. I don't know what the resistance of a pool of saturated salt solution would be but I can see that very high voltages might have to be used to get enough current to make either device operate (IMO). Anyway, best of luck and worth a try!
So, I would be making an attempt with two cells of 1.5V each. If it didn't work, I would plug the wires in the switchboard.
Science is fun, math is rum and music is a sticky gum! To kill the zombies, click the [+] button -->
- Posts: 487 | Joined: 25-November 10
Reply
#8 27 June 2011 - 07:52 AM
I have finally done the experiment. I used the electricity which comes to our home (220V). It worked with ease. I saw a spark, one end of wire made a small hole in the bowl(steel). But I couldn't saw the spring contract and relax as it was instantaneous. But since the spark is produced, I succeed in it.
Science is fun, math is rum and music is a sticky gum! To kill the zombies, click the [+] button -->
- Posts: 487 | Joined: 25-November 10
Reply
#9 27 June 2011 - 07:55 AM
rktpro, on 27 June 2011 - 07:52 AM, said:
I have finally done the experiment. I used the electricity which comes to our home (220V). It worked with ease. I saw a spark, one end of wire made a small hole in the bowl(steel). But I couldn't saw the spring contract and relax as it was instantaneous. But since the spark is produced, I succeed in it.
Glad you are still alive !! it's very unwise to experiment with mains voltages so I suspect a bit of a wind up! Also the device is designed to work with a DC supply although the coil should tighten regardless of current direction.
This post has been edited by TonyMcC: 27 June 2011 - 08:25 AM
- Posts: 808 | Joined: 07-February 10
Reply
#10 27 June 2011 - 12:45 PM
TonyMcC, on 27 June 2011 - 07:55 AM, said:
Glad you are still alive !! it's very unwise to experiment with mains voltages so I suspect a bit of a wind up! Also the device is designed to work with a DC supply although the coil should tighten regardless of current direction.
My mom kept warning me. I thought I should take risk. After all science is fun and risk. But the wire had insulation.
Still, the spark was so sparkling that I got scared and dropped the spring in the NaCl. There wasn't a spark again! For attraction between the coil, they should be in different media than electrolyte.
Science is fun, math is rum and music is a sticky gum! To kill the zombies, click the [+] button -->
- Posts: 487 | Joined: 25-November 10
Reply
#11 4 July 2011 - 01:34 PM
TonyMcC, on 27 June 2011 - 07:55 AM, said:
Glad you are still alive !! it's very unwise to experiment with mains voltages so I suspect a bit of a wind up! Also the device is designed to work with a DC supply although the coil should tighten regardless of current direction.
Are you really sure if it would work with AC too?
Science is fun, math is rum and music is a sticky gum! To kill the zombies, click the [+] button -->
- Posts: 487 | Joined: 25-November 10
Reply
#12 5 July 2011 - 01:55 PM
rktpro, on 4 July 2011 - 01:34 PM, said:
Are you really sure if it would work with AC too?
I've never made one or applied AC to one so my answer is an opinion. All that seems necessary for the turns of the helix to be attracted to each other is that current flows around the turns so that adjacent turns carry current in the same direction. This will happen regardless of the direction of current passing through the coil. It seems to me that applying AC will shorten the distance between the turns in a pulsating fashion and this should make the device work. I neglect the effect of the coils inductance because the frequency is relatively low and there is no iron core to consider. I suppose if the individual tugs of attraction are small and the ball is heavy you might only see the coil vibrating. I repeat this is something I have never tried but my answer seems to agree with theory.
This post has been edited by TonyMcC: 5 July 2011 - 02:04 PM
- Posts: 808 | Joined: 07-February 10
Reply
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1

Help
Sign In »
Register Now!













