Science Forums: Roget's Spiral - Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology to computer science, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!
  
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help  registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Create a ScienceForums.Net Blog!
Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Roget's Spiral apparatus Rate Topic: -----

#1 rktpro 


Molecule
I have to make a working model to demonstrate Roget's Spiral experiment. The apparatus originally used included mercury. But since it applies to all electrolytes ,I would just pour common salt in water and use it. Would it produce spark or not?
Science is fun, math is rum and music is a sticky gum! To kill the zombies, click the [+] button -->
0

#2 imatfaal 


Icon
Primate
Roget's spiral ---> coil, corkscrew, curlicue, gyration,gyre,helix, screw, whorl






Sorry - I'll get my coat and leave


A little learning is a dangerous thing; drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, and drinking largely sobers us again.

- Alexander Pope
feel free to click the green [+] ---->
1

#3 swansont 


Icon
Shaken, not Stirred
I don't see why it wouldn't work. Along the same lines I've been meaning to build a Faraday motor using salt water instead of mercury.
Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum

Stop failing the Turing test!

My SFN blog: Swans on Tea

To release the hounds, click the [+] sign ->
0

#4 rktpro 


Molecule
One more thing, I am using two cells of 1.5V each. Would they be enough for it? What should be the thickness of coil for it?
Science is fun, math is rum and music is a sticky gum! To kill the zombies, click the [+] button -->
0

#5 swansont 


Icon
Shaken, not Stirred

View Postrktpro, on 26 June 2011 - 12:05 PM, said:

One more thing, I am using two cells of 1.5V each. Would they be enough for it? What should be the thickness of coil for it?


The motor I already built used a single battery; the resistance of the wire will give you an indication of the current that will flow. It will be lower than V=IR, because there is also an inductance that adds to the impedance, but the overall behavior will depend on the configuration (e.g. pitch) and the mechanical properties of the coil.
Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum

Stop failing the Turing test!

My SFN blog: Swans on Tea

To release the hounds, click the [+] sign ->
0

#6 TonyMcC 


Quark
I think this is one of those things that should work in theory but might be difficult to get working in practice due to the relatively high resistance of salt water when compared to mercury. I think,for example, that the resistivity of sea water is about 5 million times that of mercury. I don't know what the resistance of a pool of saturated salt solution would be but I can see that very high voltages might have to be used to get enough current to make either device operate (IMO). Anyway, best of luck and worth a try!

0

#7 rktpro 


Molecule

View PostTonyMcC, on 26 June 2011 - 04:15 PM, said:

I think this is one of those things that should work in theory but might be difficult to get working in practice due to the relatively high resistance of salt water when compared to mercury. I think,for example, that the resistivity of sea water is about 5 million times that of mercury. I don't know what the resistance of a pool of saturated salt solution would be but I can see that very high voltages might have to be used to get enough current to make either device operate (IMO). Anyway, best of luck and worth a try!


So, I would be making an attempt with two cells of 1.5V each. If it didn't work, I would plug the wires in the switchboard.
Science is fun, math is rum and music is a sticky gum! To kill the zombies, click the [+] button -->
0

#8 rktpro 


Molecule
I have finally done the experiment. I used the electricity which comes to our home (220V). It worked with ease. I saw a spark, one end of wire made a small hole in the bowl(steel). But I couldn't saw the spring contract and relax as it was instantaneous. But since the spark is produced, I succeed in it.
Science is fun, math is rum and music is a sticky gum! To kill the zombies, click the [+] button -->
1

#9 TonyMcC 


Quark

View Postrktpro, on 27 June 2011 - 07:52 AM, said:

I have finally done the experiment. I used the electricity which comes to our home (220V). It worked with ease. I saw a spark, one end of wire made a small hole in the bowl(steel). But I couldn't saw the spring contract and relax as it was instantaneous. But since the spark is produced, I succeed in it.


Glad you are still alive !! it's very unwise to experiment with mains voltages so I suspect a bit of a wind up! Also the device is designed to work with a DC supply although the coil should tighten regardless of current direction.

This post has been edited by TonyMcC: 27 June 2011 - 08:25 AM


0

#10 rktpro 


Molecule

View PostTonyMcC, on 27 June 2011 - 07:55 AM, said:

Glad you are still alive !! it's very unwise to experiment with mains voltages so I suspect a bit of a wind up! Also the device is designed to work with a DC supply although the coil should tighten regardless of current direction.


My mom kept warning me. I thought I should take risk. After all science is fun and risk. But the wire had insulation.
Still, the spark was so sparkling that I got scared and dropped the spring in the NaCl. There wasn't a spark again! For attraction between the coil, they should be in different media than electrolyte.
Science is fun, math is rum and music is a sticky gum! To kill the zombies, click the [+] button -->
0

#11 rktpro 


Molecule

View PostTonyMcC, on 27 June 2011 - 07:55 AM, said:

Glad you are still alive !! it's very unwise to experiment with mains voltages so I suspect a bit of a wind up! Also the device is designed to work with a DC supply although the coil should tighten regardless of current direction.


Are you really sure if it would work with AC too?
Science is fun, math is rum and music is a sticky gum! To kill the zombies, click the [+] button -->
0

#12 TonyMcC 


Quark

View Postrktpro, on 4 July 2011 - 01:34 PM, said:

Are you really sure if it would work with AC too?


I've never made one or applied AC to one so my answer is an opinion. All that seems necessary for the turns of the helix to be attracted to each other is that current flows around the turns so that adjacent turns carry current in the same direction. This will happen regardless of the direction of current passing through the coil. It seems to me that applying AC will shorten the distance between the turns in a pulsating fashion and this should make the device work. I neglect the effect of the coils inductance because the frequency is relatively low and there is no iron core to consider. I suppose if the individual tugs of attraction are small and the ball is heavy you might only see the coil vibrating. I repeat this is something I have never tried but my answer seems to agree with theory.

This post has been edited by TonyMcC: 5 July 2011 - 02:04 PM


0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users