Jump to content

Wrong calculation of PI


neodarko

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I once read a story that a man calculated the value of PI upto a substantial number of decimal places manually. It was later discovered (after his death) that after a certain number of places - the calculation was wrong.

 

I sort of need to find the story. Google search didn't turn up anything. Any help is much appreciated.

 

Thanks.

 

[PS: sorry if this is the wrong forum - this seemed like the best fit]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

William Shanks.

"The pinnacle of hand computation of π was achieved in the nineteenth century. William Shanks was a mathematician who spent a great amount of time compiling logarithm tables, prime number tables, and the like; in the days before calculating machines, large tables of such values were essential for work in engineering or physics.

He did try his hand at π, using Machins formula, and in 1873, after many years of labor, presented 707 digits of the number.

But π can be a cruel and fickle muse. It was later discovered that Shanks had made a mistake, and that after the 527th digit, his calculations were wrong. Nevertheless, it was the best value of π available until the advent of high-speed digital computers." from here

Edited by michel123456
Link to comment
Share on other sites

William Shanks.

"The pinnacle of hand computation of π was achieved in the nineteenth century. William Shanks was a mathematician who spent a great amount of time compiling logarithm tables, prime number tables, and the like; in the days before calculating machines, large tables of such values were essential for work in engineering or physics.

He did try his hand at π, using Machin’s formula, and in 1873, after many years of labor, presented 707 digits of the number.

But π can be a cruel and fickle muse. It was later discovered that Shanks had made a mistake, and that after the 527th digit, his calculations were wrong. Nevertheless, it was the best value of π available until the advent of high-speed digital computers." from here

 

Nobody bothered to recalculate it for all those years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.