Science Forums: A Very Possible Formula - Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology to computer science, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!
  
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help  registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Create a ScienceForums.Net Blog!
Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

A Very Possible Formula Rate Topic: -----

#1 Kirbx 


Lepton
You know in science class I have been watching a show about string theory. String thoery is a piece of garbage but they did bring up a good point in the movie. In out universe the large like then planets and stars is ruled by the laws of General Relitivity while the small things like atoms are rules by Quantem Mechanics. Now obiously you can't have 2 sets of rules for one universe that's aburd. This comes to be a problem with things like back holes which gratitate with General Relitivity but move around each other like Quantem Mechanics.

So I theorize this: if they are 2 of the same rules and are true for the same universe they must be equal.

General Relitivity = Quantem Mechanics

so...

Quantem Mechanics - General Relitivity = 0

Bitches it took me 5 minutes to figure that out and most people spend there whole lifes.

Suck it B)
-7

#2 Fuzzwood 


Formerly known as Fswd
Yeah, any proof to support that claim?
0

#3 ajb 


Icon
Physics Expert
This is just rubbish.
"In physics you don't have to go around making trouble for yourself - nature does it for you" Frank Wilczek.

My homepage.
0

#4 hewj11 


Quark
We don't need this
0

#5 Incendia 


Atom
Your words are 'FAIL' my good sir,...do you even understand General Relativity or Quantum Mechanics?

Problems:
1. You swore at me and everyone else who read this nonsense...that is unwise.
2. I don't think you understand GR or QM otherwise you would see how foolish you sound and how much this looks like nonsense...I think you should have done more research into QM and GR before posting such nonsensical things. Try getting a physicist to explain both theories to you. I dare you to ask for all the detail, and equations without simplifying them.
3. You have no evidence.
4. This should be in speculations as you haven't proved it.
5. That's not a formula.
6. What you said is that two unrelated theories are the same thing.
7. There is no 7 because I'm a nice person who doesn't like hurting peoples feelings...
"A question that sometimes drives me hazy: am I or are the others crazy?" - Albert Einstein


"I do not think there is any thrill that can go through the human heart like that felt by the inventor as he sees some creation of the brain unfolding to success... such emotions make a man forget food, sleep, friends, love, everything." - Nikola Tesla

This post comes to you from a Socialist.
0

#6 steevey 


Molecule
It's almost as if he posted this wrong intentionally for some reason...
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users