Cap'n Refsmmat Posted March 24, 2010 Author Share Posted March 24, 2010 I don't think it is that bad to have it next to the logo, honestly.. and if we don't want it there, we should find something else to put there.. it'll be a bit empty. Wouldn't work well on small screens. We ran into screen resolution issues while placing our current Google ads as well, actually. Oh, and I showed the logos to a good friend of mine who's a professional designer. She liked them, but she said something that I agree with completely: We should choose *either* the orbitals, *or* the integral. Putting them both into one logo makes the logo too cramped and messy, as if we couldn't decide which of them we want. I dunno, I think you could get away with it if you space out the logo some -- move the ScienceForums.net text out and the integral sign away from the orbitals. Take a look at how the current logo is spaced, for example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toastywombel Posted March 24, 2010 Share Posted March 24, 2010 I was talking with mooey and I mentioned maybe a soft glow on the biohazard black. Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedAlso, it might be nice to see the scienceforums.net set to the right of the logo instead of the bottom? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ydoaPs Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 I like the idea of mixing the atom with the integral sign, but it might look better using our current ovals(orientation and thickness, not necessarily colour). I think the golden ratio one has some issues, though. It's not really something that you can just grab a pen and doodle; simpler is better. It also seems somewhat out of place on the forum design. One of the good things about the integral logo is colour independance; it works with pretty much all colour schemes and thus would not need to be reworked if we were to add coloured skins as suggested in another thread. That should be a property of whichever one we end up using, imo. Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedhttp://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showpost.php?p=553072&postcount=10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Janus Posted March 29, 2010 Share Posted March 29, 2010 this was just for fun, as I realize that an animated logo is a bit much (and hard to put on a t-shirt1). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mooeypoo Posted March 29, 2010 Share Posted March 29, 2010 If only we had the funds, we could do a properly animated tshirt: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toastywombel Posted April 8, 2010 Share Posted April 8, 2010 this was just for fun, as I realize that an animated logo is a bit much (and hard to put on a t-shirt1). This is amazingly cool to me . I was staring at those rotating electrons for about a minute. It might distract readers from the forums though haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mooeypoo Posted April 8, 2010 Share Posted April 8, 2010 This is amazingly cool to me . I was staring at those rotating electrons for about a minute. It might distract readers from the forums though haha. I made a tshirt with the current SFN logo on it for TAM6 (if you look in my albums in the forum you'll see it). I managed to get the same animated effect when I jumped up and down in succession. Totally doable. ~moo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted April 9, 2010 Author Share Posted April 9, 2010 Everyone cast your votes! http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=50847 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts