Science Forums: Is Avogadro's Number Accurate? - Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology to computer science, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!
  
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help  registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Create a ScienceForums.Net Blog!
Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Is Avogadro's Number Accurate? Rate Topic: -----

#1 jimmydasaint 


Atom
I have grown up believing that Avogadro's number is a constant like the speed of light. However, there must have been attempts to get more accurate figures.

Just out of interest, I wonder what the number is now and how it is calculated?
88.2% of Statistics are made up on the spot
-- Vic Reeves
0

#2 YT2095 


Icon
Chemistry Expert
I think it was established through experimental means rather than mathematically.
0

#3 insane_alien 


Genius
yep, its experimental. and seeing as we have very accurate measurements for the mass of atoms it is a relatively simple calculation.

what you do is, you take the value of 12grams (the mass of 1 mole of carbon-12 which is the accepted baseline) and divide it by the mass of 1 atom of carbon-12. this will give you the number of atoms in a mole.

there will be some error but it will be tiny and generally insignificant(on the order of maybe a few thousand atoms.)
Tired of waiting around for a reply on the forums? Use IRC, 'I don't know how' is no longer an excuse.

"Special" Relativity, stupid ideas seem smarter when they come at you really fast.
0

#4 User is online  swansont 


Icon
Shaken, not Stirred

jimmydasaint said:

I have grown up believing that Avogadro's number is a constant like the speed of light. However, there must have been attempts to get more accurate figures.

Just out of interest, I wonder what the number is now and how it is calculated?


6.022 141 79 (30) x 10^23 mol^-1

http://physics.nist....in/cuu/Value?na
Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum

Stop failing the Turing test!

My SFN blog: Swans on Tea

To release the hounds, click the [+] sign ->
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users