Science Forums: Making heavy water - Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology to computer science, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!
  
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help  registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Create a ScienceForums.Net Blog!
Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse
  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Making heavy water Rate Topic: -----

#41 Mrl4 


Quark
heavy water and normal water have slightly different boiling point: heavy water boils at 101 degrees C, while normal water boils at 100. You should have a very precise heater. That way you can make the normal water evaporate, and get heavy water.:rolleyes:

this is not fully reliable :P but you could always try...

This post has been edited by Mrl4: 27 November 2011 - 06:05 PM

0

#42 insane_alien 


Genius

View PostMrl4, on 27 November 2011 - 06:03 PM, said:

heavy water and normal water have slightly different boiling point: heavy water boils at 101 degrees C, while normal water boils at 100. You should have a very precise heater. That way you can make the normal water evaporate, and get heavy water.:rolleyes:


only if you have an awful lot of patience or are willing to build an extremely large distillation facility.

distillation loses effectiveness very rapidly as boiling points converge.
Tired of waiting around for a reply on the forums? Use IRC, 'I don't know how' is no longer an excuse.

"Special" Relativity, stupid ideas seem smarter when they come at you really fast.
0

#43 mississippichem 


Icon
fluorescent protein

View Postinsane_alien, on 27 November 2011 - 06:06 PM, said:

only if you have an awful lot of patience or are willing to build an extremely large distillation facility.

distillation loses effectiveness very rapidly as boiling points converge.


Yeah true. That might take a mile high fractional distillation column.

You can't get away with pressure swing distillation either because both components are essentially chemically identical.
You've come a long way. Remember back when we defined what a velocity meant? Now we are talking about an antisymmetric tensor of second rank in four dimensions.

-Feynman Lectures on Physics II
0

#44 insane_alien 


Genius

View Postmississippichem, on 27 November 2011 - 07:26 PM, said:

Yeah true. That might take a mile high fractional distillation column.

You can't get away with pressure swing distillation either because both components are essentially chemically identical.


I calculated it (approximately) once. IIRC it came out at something like 30 km tall.

Of course that can be split to multiple smaller columns. but still.
Tired of waiting around for a reply on the forums? Use IRC, 'I don't know how' is no longer an excuse.

"Special" Relativity, stupid ideas seem smarter when they come at you really fast.
0

Share this topic:


  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users