Jump to content

Braking up a hill


JamesC

Recommended Posts

Wow - I love this place - just spent about an hour reading through the forums.

 

Anyway - my question relates to this: (cue violins)

 

ohbugger.jpg

 

Basically - someone was driving too quickly and went in to me as I pulled out. There is no way I could have seen him - but of course it's probably going to be considered my fault :(

 

Now, I used this peice of literature:

 

http://www.harristechnical.com/articles/skidmarks.pdf

 

to make this:

 

http://www.mintylamb.co.uk/crashomatic.php

 

14 metres of skidmarks means he was doing around 30mph - which is on the limit - and certainly too quick for the residential street.

 

HOWEVER - one big factor (I think) is the fact he was going up a hill when he went in to me - which I believe would further increase his initial speed (not to mention the fact that the skidmarks go on after he hit my car! - but thats another matter!)

 

Anyone want to guesstimate how much this would effect it? I have averaged the hill out at a 1:16 (for every 16 metres forwards it goes 1 metre up)

 

 

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, you are correct that going uphill will, in principle, decrease the braking distance, so that he must have been going faster.

 

1/2 mv2 = Fd + mgh

 

Fd is the energy used up in the brakes due to the skid, so that's the equivalent of 1/2 m (30mph)2 (F is the average braking force, d is the distance, 14 m)

 

m is the mass of the car, g is 9.81 m/s2 and h is the vertical distance (height) change over the path.

 

So the mass cancels out, and h is about a meter. Now convert all the units and do the math

 

You get about 31.5 mph, asuming I did the math correctly. But all this ignores the energy lost in the collision with your car. The speed has to be even higher than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheers guys... would you believe it - after posting that I happened to do a quick Google and found a page I never found before (having been looking all day):

 

https://atiam.train.army.mil/soldierPortal/atia/adlsc/view/public/7670-1/fm/19-25/CH12.htm#img062

 

So for sure he was doing 30+ - considering the damage done to my car - a fair bit I reckon! I don't think that's a 5 or 10mph nudge...

 

I guess now I have to work things backwards and see what speed he would have to be doing to be driving "safely" - if you work out the reaction times (using 1.4s as the time it takes to notice something and put your foot on the brake) - 20mph would mean he would have stopped several metres before he would have ever hit me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wouldn't you also have to have a account of how far he had his foot down on the break and the friction in the road, average breaking distances for his car (from the car company might do something similar) in order to figure out how fast he was going?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His foot is down on the brake enough to lock the brakes (and thus cause a skidmark) - so that's not an issue. None of the forumula I have found take in to account tyre size yet - but perhaps this is insignificant - as it seems is the weight of the car. Those two may be interlinked (bigger car = bigger tyres)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you should probably check the manufacture's website, because they should have the data your looking for, as in the mass of the car, tire size (if it matters) and most importantly somewhere they probably have data on the distance it takes the car to break in normal and other circumstances

 

at the very least you could request the information directly from the company, I'm sure they have it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't report it at the time - I was a little shaken. I realise in hindsight now that I should have. Still - my amateur investigation will hopefully give something for the insurers to look in to. I still think its going to be blamed on me - but maybe I can get a 50/50 out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- if you work out the reaction times (using 1.4s as the time it takes to notice something and put your foot on the brake) - .
I think 1.4 s is excessively long. I think .75 s would be more accurate.

 

My reaction time, from the time I see..say....a red light, to the time I can flick a switch is around .24 s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found 1.4s as a time that is used in crash investigation. I've read anywhere from 1 to 2 seconds also.

 

Flicking a switch is slightly different to driving a car - you have to move your foot off of the throttle and on to the brake for a start... and that's not a straight forward movement. Also - sitting and waiting for a light and knowing its coming, and flicking a switch under controlled conditions isnt anywhere near the same as on the road. If you drove like that the whole time you would be a nervous wreck. I think people tend to relax slightly in the car - which is probably better for fatigue in the long run. You're also taking in a lot more visual information than looking for a light - there are all sorts of things to concentrate on.

 

However - interestingly - the car that crashed in to me was on hand controls! Not sure how that effects things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't report it at the time - I was a little shaken. I realise in hindsight now that I should have. Still - my amateur investigation will hopefully give something for the insurers to look in to. I still think its going to be blamed on me - but maybe I can get a 50/50 out of it.

 

Sadly, insurance companies only really pay attention to the evidence recorded in a police report. Their reasoning is that the police are an independent party and are unlikely to alter the physical data in order to benefit one side or another. Also, the police reports are generated right there at the scene of the accident shortly after the accident took place, so there isn't really a whole lot of time for the evidence to be altered. While your investigation may give you peace of mind, I highly doubt it will alter the thinking of the insurance companies at all. :-(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.