Another government perpetrate lie: they didn't find anything incredible in Einsteins disected brain------ they actually found severly enlarged nanobioroboticsensor-reciever/transmitor glands--- with traces of radiation that tells us he got the answers from the enlightened spirits of his Jewish anscestry.
Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!
|
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.
|
|
| Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse | |
Neils Bhor or Albert Einstein
#22 12 June 2003 - 06:10 PM
I presume your joking? did the government also sneak into my bedroom and steal that 10 quid note i cant find? You know what, come to think of it, it could only have been the US government. an oganisation linked with so many pathetically inept conspiracy theories must be responsible for something right?
Greg
Chemistry Forum Moderator
Tegestologist: one who collects beer coasters.
Chemistry Forum Moderator
Tegestologist: one who collects beer coasters.
- Posts: 499 | Joined: 11-February 03
Reply
#24 12 June 2003 - 11:03 PM
it could be a larvae of several things. pizza specials from the chip shop beside my school, packs of ciggarettes, beer, beer, vodka, beer - they all seem to appear whenever 10 quid notes disappear.
just reading over your post, receiving enlightenment from his jewish ancestry is maybe the most ridiculous single claim ever posted on science forums, sarcastic or not. even adams pole shift claims werent as obscure (just).
just reading over your post, receiving enlightenment from his jewish ancestry is maybe the most ridiculous single claim ever posted on science forums, sarcastic or not. even adams pole shift claims werent as obscure (just).
Greg
Chemistry Forum Moderator
Tegestologist: one who collects beer coasters.
Chemistry Forum Moderator
Tegestologist: one who collects beer coasters.
- Posts: 499 | Joined: 11-February 03
Reply
#26 12 June 2003 - 11:58 PM
Quote
Originally posted by NavajoEverclear
Another government perpetrate lie: they didn't find anything incredible in Einsteins disected brain------ they actually found severly enlarged nanobioroboticsensor-reciever/transmitor glands--- with traces of radiation that tells us he got the answers from the enlightened spirits of his Jewish anscestry.
Another government perpetrate lie: they didn't find anything incredible in Einsteins disected brain------ they actually found severly enlarged nanobioroboticsensor-reciever/transmitor glands--- with traces of radiation that tells us he got the answers from the enlightened spirits of his Jewish anscestry.
Funny, because Einstein was a non practicing Jew.
"Facts are stupid things"-Ronald Reagan
- Posts: 178 | Joined: 03-February 03
Reply
#29 17 June 2003 - 09:01 PM
I didn't read through most of this, so forgive any repeated information.
It is true that GR cannot be "The Theory of Gravity", but this hardly had anything to do with Bohr. The only quantitative work that Bohr did in QM is the (long-defunct) model that bears his name. It was Schrodinger and Heisenberg who did the bulk of the work in nonrelativistic QM; Dirac, Klein, and Gordon who are most famous for relativistic QM; Feynman, Schwinger, Tomonaga, who are most famous for relativistic QFT.
Ever hear of the Dirac equation? How about relativistic quantum field theory?
Indeed!
???
Neils Bohr
1. The Bohr model.
2. Correct interpretation of quantum mechanics.
Albert Einstein
1. Special relativity.
2. General relativity.
3. Brownian motion.
4. Photoelectric effect.
5. Bose-Einstein statistics.
This is just plain stupid.
Let me ask you something. Are you a member of the MSN Physics message board, and do you listen to a guy named Starship? If so, then STOP!
Quote
Originally posted by Miseria_
Simple Enough, Who's smarter?
Neils Bhor by far in my opinion, his revoloutionary ideas on quatum mechanics have acctually proved Albert Einstein wrong,
Simple Enough, Who's smarter?
Neils Bhor by far in my opinion, his revoloutionary ideas on quatum mechanics have acctually proved Albert Einstein wrong,
It is true that GR cannot be "The Theory of Gravity", but this hardly had anything to do with Bohr. The only quantitative work that Bohr did in QM is the (long-defunct) model that bears his name. It was Schrodinger and Heisenberg who did the bulk of the work in nonrelativistic QM; Dirac, Klein, and Gordon who are most famous for relativistic QM; Feynman, Schwinger, Tomonaga, who are most famous for relativistic QFT.
Quote
and so if Albert Einstein was to acctually accept Quantum Mechanics, then he would have to abandon e=mc^2.
Ever hear of the Dirac equation? How about relativistic quantum field theory?
Quote
(Warning, Intellect may be required!)
Indeed!
Quote
I also beleive that Neils Bhor Deserves more credit for the acheivements he has made.
???
Neils Bohr
1. The Bohr model.
2. Correct interpretation of quantum mechanics.
Albert Einstein
1. Special relativity.
2. General relativity.
3. Brownian motion.
4. Photoelectric effect.
5. Bose-Einstein statistics.
Quote
Originally posted by NavajoEverclear
Einstien is better because he is a Jew.
Einstien is better because he is a Jew.
This is just plain stupid.
Quote
Another interesting fact: people think Einstien never succeed in achieving a unified theory, actually he did-- on his death bed. The government confiscated the information and much enjoys watching everyone squirm and suffer in confusion.
Let me ask you something. Are you a member of the MSN Physics message board, and do you listen to a guy named Starship? If so, then STOP!
Tom
- Posts: 772 | Joined: 07-November 02
Reply
#30 17 June 2003 - 09:12 PM
In our state of existence where everything is know by observation through our senses--- which is scientifically absolutely unknown how efficient these are----- what is stupid and what is smart or any other judgement may not be what it seems at all. But I am pretty stupid, so its ok. I was by the way joking about all of that. Yes I know starship well, he are actually adversary's----- he works an underground organazation even worse than our current governement which plans to release itself in two days and put us all i bondage---- their philosophy is that strength strives under oppression. Of coarse the other superpowers will keep these radicals under control so the public will never know about it. These kind of things happen every other day.---------- actually to be honost i don't know him. Maybe i'll plan to meet him sometime.
- Posts: 797 | Joined: 01-June 03
Reply
#31 17 June 2003 - 09:20 PM
Oh by the way everyone on my area 51 invasion development------ there is this guy in New Zealand who is legally building a cruise missile with parts off the internent---- I'm going to email him.
(if you don't believe me look up Bruce Simpson/ his X-Jet, there is plenty of News published about it, it isn't a secret because some people think he's a security threat. He says he does it to show how accessible potentially dangerous materials are)
BTW what chatroom is starship in?
(if you don't believe me look up Bruce Simpson/ his X-Jet, there is plenty of News published about it, it isn't a secret because some people think he's a security threat. He says he does it to show how accessible potentially dangerous materials are)
BTW what chatroom is starship in?
- Posts: 797 | Joined: 01-June 03
Reply
#33 17 June 2003 - 11:52 PM
Dont be so sure, infact dont be sure at all. I'd rather be friend with you. Starship sounds like a rebel, I HATE rebels . Radicalism if to survive as all other things must adapt or evolve, thus is constantly changing to what best truly suits its mentality.
Please don't assume I am like someone else who appears to express a few of the same personality traits I do---- to be honost I actually think a lot different than anyone, I usually find myself compromising my thoughts to adjust to what translates in our vastly inefficient language.
Please don't assume I am like someone else who appears to express a few of the same personality traits I do---- to be honost I actually think a lot different than anyone, I usually find myself compromising my thoughts to adjust to what translates in our vastly inefficient language.
- Posts: 797 | Joined: 01-June 03
Reply
#34 10 September 2003 - 06:06 PM
I wouldn't want to choose. Each man has given so much to the progress of mankind. I think we all owe them both a great debt. Pushing the boundries of human understanding is as difficult an undertaking as I can think of. I personaly don't like legue tables (exept the ones that have Glasgow Rangers at the top). However I would say that I find it sad that the vast majority of people would not know who Neils Bhor was.
- Posts: 27 | Joined: 31-August 03
Reply
#35 21 January 2004 - 12:09 PM
"Einstein is better because he's a Jew"
Whoever said that, is an idiot. Niels Bohr is also a Jew, lol.
http://www.yahoodi.c...s/science1.html
:rolleyes: :embarass: :rolleyes: :embarass: :rolleyes: :embarass:
Whoever said that, is an idiot. Niels Bohr is also a Jew, lol.
http://www.yahoodi.c...s/science1.html
:rolleyes: :embarass: :rolleyes: :embarass: :rolleyes: :embarass:
- Posts: 49 | Joined: 11-January 04
Reply
#37 14 July 2004 - 09:33 PM
Einstien wins over Bohr hands down... Borh was definately very smart, and he certainly contributed. But Einstien rewrote the book on physics almost single handedly, and he contributed to other things than SR and GR. He actually won his nobel prize as a result of his work in quantum mechanics (even if later he didn't agree with it).
I'd say Newton should be up there, what with his laws of gravitation, invention of calculus (well, another guy did it as well, but Newton had something to do with it anyway)
I'd say Newton should be up there, what with his laws of gravitation, invention of calculus (well, another guy did it as well, but Newton had something to do with it anyway)
- Posts: 1,198 | Joined: 16-May 04
Reply
#38 15 July 2004 - 04:51 PM
'[Tycho?] said:
Einstien wins over Bohr hands down... Borh was definately very smart, and he certainly contributed. But Einstien rewrote the book on physics almost single handedly, and he contributed to other things than SR and GR. He actually won his nobel prize as a result of his work in quantum mechanics (even if later he didn't agree with it).
The photoelectric effect, to be precise.
'[Tycho?] said:
I'd say Newton should be up there, what with his laws of gravitation, invention of calculus (well, another guy did it as well, but Newton had something to do with it anyway)
Liebniz. Newton was a right pillock, though.
- Posts: 3,281 | Joined: 27-July 02
Reply

Help
Sign In »
Register Now!
This topic is locked
















