Science Forums: Neils Bhor or Albert Einstein - Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology to computer science, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!
  
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help  registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Create a ScienceForums.Net Blog!
Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse
  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

Neils Bhor or Albert Einstein Rate Topic: -----

#21 NavajoEverclear 


Molecule
Another government perpetrate lie: they didn't find anything incredible in Einsteins disected brain------ they actually found severly enlarged nanobioroboticsensor-reciever/transmitor glands--- with traces of radiation that tells us he got the answers from the enlightened spirits of his Jewish anscestry.
0

#22 greg1917 


Molecule
I presume your joking? did the government also sneak into my bedroom and steal that 10 quid note i cant find? You know what, come to think of it, it could only have been the US government. an oganisation linked with so many pathetically inept conspiracy theories must be responsible for something right?
Greg
Chemistry Forum Moderator

Tegestologist: one who collects beer coasters.
0

#23 NavajoEverclear 


Molecule
actually that probably has more to do with Hogslayers Theory--- socks are clothes hanger larvae---- socks disappear, and you got too many hangers-- its obviously true. So what is you 10 quid a larvae of?
0

#24 greg1917 


Molecule
it could be a larvae of several things. pizza specials from the chip shop beside my school, packs of ciggarettes, beer, beer, vodka, beer - they all seem to appear whenever 10 quid notes disappear.

just reading over your post, receiving enlightenment from his jewish ancestry is maybe the most ridiculous single claim ever posted on science forums, sarcastic or not. even adams pole shift claims werent as obscure (just).
Greg
Chemistry Forum Moderator

Tegestologist: one who collects beer coasters.
0

#25 NavajoEverclear 


Molecule
uhhhhhhhhhhh
0

#26 the GardenGnome 


Baryon

Quote

Originally posted by NavajoEverclear
Another government perpetrate lie: they didn't find anything incredible in Einsteins disected brain------ they actually found severly enlarged nanobioroboticsensor-reciever/transmitor glands--- with traces of radiation that tells us he got the answers from the enlightened spirits of his Jewish anscestry.


Funny, because Einstein was a non practicing Jew.
"Facts are stupid things"-Ronald Reagan
0

#27 NavajoEverclear 


Molecule
thats what they WANT you to think.
0

#28 Miseria_ 


Quark
I have totally lost track of this

Probably for the best
:D
I dont get it.
0

#29 Tom Mattson 


Molecule
I didn't read through most of this, so forgive any repeated information.

Quote

Originally posted by Miseria_
Simple Enough, Who's smarter?

Neils Bhor by far in my opinion, his revoloutionary ideas on quatum mechanics have acctually proved Albert Einstein wrong,


It is true that GR cannot be "The Theory of Gravity", but this hardly had anything to do with Bohr. The only quantitative work that Bohr did in QM is the (long-defunct) model that bears his name. It was Schrodinger and Heisenberg who did the bulk of the work in nonrelativistic QM; Dirac, Klein, and Gordon who are most famous for relativistic QM; Feynman, Schwinger, Tomonaga, who are most famous for relativistic QFT.

Quote

and so if Albert Einstein was to acctually accept Quantum Mechanics, then he would have to abandon e=mc^2.


Ever hear of the Dirac equation? How about relativistic quantum field theory?

Quote

(Warning, Intellect may be required!)


Indeed!

Quote

I also beleive that Neils Bhor Deserves more credit for the acheivements he has made.


???

Neils Bohr
1. The Bohr model.
2. Correct interpretation of quantum mechanics.

Albert Einstein
1. Special relativity.
2. General relativity.
3. Brownian motion.
4. Photoelectric effect.
5. Bose-Einstein statistics.

Quote

Originally posted by NavajoEverclear
Einstien is better because he is a Jew.


This is just plain stupid.

Quote

Another interesting fact: people think Einstien never succeed in achieving a unified theory, actually he did-- on his death bed. The government confiscated the information and much enjoys watching everyone squirm and suffer in confusion.


Let me ask you something. Are you a member of the MSN Physics message board, and do you listen to a guy named Starship? If so, then STOP!
Tom
0

#30 NavajoEverclear 


Molecule
In our state of existence where everything is know by observation through our senses--- which is scientifically absolutely unknown how efficient these are----- what is stupid and what is smart or any other judgement may not be what it seems at all. But I am pretty stupid, so its ok. I was by the way joking about all of that. Yes I know starship well, he are actually adversary's----- he works an underground organazation even worse than our current governement which plans to release itself in two days and put us all i bondage---- their philosophy is that strength strives under oppression. Of coarse the other superpowers will keep these radicals under control so the public will never know about it. These kind of things happen every other day.---------- actually to be honost i don't know him. Maybe i'll plan to meet him sometime.
0

#31 NavajoEverclear 


Molecule
Oh by the way everyone on my area 51 invasion development------ there is this guy in New Zealand who is legally building a cruise missile with parts off the internent---- I'm going to email him.
(if you don't believe me look up Bruce Simpson/ his X-Jet, there is plenty of News published about it, it isn't a secret because some people think he's a security threat. He says he does it to show how accessible potentially dangerous materials are)
BTW what chatroom is starship in?
0

#32 Tom Mattson 


Molecule

Quote

Originally posted by NavajoEverclear
BTW what chatroom is starship in?


MSN Physics. You two will get along great.
Tom
0

#33 NavajoEverclear 


Molecule
Dont be so sure, infact dont be sure at all. I'd rather be friend with you. Starship sounds like a rebel, I HATE rebels . Radicalism if to survive as all other things must adapt or evolve, thus is constantly changing to what best truly suits its mentality.
Please don't assume I am like someone else who appears to express a few of the same personality traits I do---- to be honost I actually think a lot different than anyone, I usually find myself compromising my thoughts to adjust to what translates in our vastly inefficient language.
0

#34 rebeldog 


Banned
I wouldn't want to choose. Each man has given so much to the progress of mankind. I think we all owe them both a great debt. Pushing the boundries of human understanding is as difficult an undertaking as I can think of. I personaly don't like legue tables (exept the ones that have Glasgow Rangers at the top). However I would say that I find it sad that the vast majority of people would not know who Neils Bhor was.
0

#35 Dreamer 


Quark
"Einstein is better because he's a Jew"

Whoever said that, is an idiot. Niels Bohr is also a Jew, lol.

http://www.yahoodi.c...s/science1.html

:rolleyes: :embarass: :rolleyes: :embarass: :rolleyes: :embarass:
0

#36 Rakdos 


Formerly Schrodngr's_cat

Radical Edward said:

heh... the most intelligent known person in science then.



Heisenberg or Schrodinger
0

#37 [Tycho?] 


Organism
Einstien wins over Bohr hands down... Borh was definately very smart, and he certainly contributed. But Einstien rewrote the book on physics almost single handedly, and he contributed to other things than SR and GR. He actually won his nobel prize as a result of his work in quantum mechanics (even if later he didn't agree with it).

I'd say Newton should be up there, what with his laws of gravitation, invention of calculus (well, another guy did it as well, but Newton had something to do with it anyway)
0

#38 JaKiri 


Primate

'[Tycho?] said:

Einstien wins over Bohr hands down... Borh was definately very smart, and he certainly contributed. But Einstien rewrote the book on physics almost single handedly, and he contributed to other things than SR and GR. He actually won his nobel prize as a result of his work in quantum mechanics (even if later he didn't agree with it).


The photoelectric effect, to be precise.

'[Tycho?] said:

I'd say Newton should be up there, what with his laws of gravitation, invention of calculus (well, another guy did it as well, but Newton had something to do with it anyway)


Liebniz. Newton was a right pillock, though.
0

#39 NSX 


Molecule
What's a pillock?
0

#40 Sayonara³ 


Icon
Doomy doom ♫
Someone who is aggressively foolish.
The Dictionary is not a technical resource.
0

Share this topic:


  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users