Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Where is the line with increasing your longevity?


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 zhillolonan

zhillolonan

    Lepton

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 6 March 2017 - 08:45 PM

Many people try countless methods and follow various lifestyles to increase their longevity. However, are all these methods ethical? 

 

Controversial aging scientist Dr. Aubrey de Grey has many theories about how to live longer. He appeared on a podcast to discuss them, interesting stuff. Let's discuss :)

 


  • 0

#2 Bender

Bender

    Molecule

  • Senior Members
  • 627 posts

Posted 8 March 2017 - 11:50 AM

Simply postponing death by a couple of years is not a problem, as long as we remain productive for sufficiently long. This condition seems trivial since we are already so productive that governments have to invent pointless jobs to keep people occupied.

 

If we cure ageing completely, we will need rules for child-bearing to prevent overpopulation. E.g. to get a child you would need to commit yourself to be euthanized a couple of decades later. There could also be a waiting list for a "child-bearing permit" to replace the people that die without having procreated. I think we need to be very strict about not allowing such a permit to be transferred in exchange for money, as that would lead to all kind of horror-scenarios.


  • 0

#3 sequent

sequent

    Lepton

  • New Members
  • 1 posts

Posted 15 March 2017 - 11:56 AM

Science is working not only to slow the death. The main goal is to remove the effects and diseases that await people in old age.


  • 0

#4 Velocity_Boy

Velocity_Boy

    Atom

  • Senior Members
  • 339 posts
  • LocationA place that used to be Mexico...

Posted 16 March 2017 - 06:20 PM

Well, I confess I didn't watch the video yet--I may or may not, since every other week somebody comes out with a new anti-aging hypothesis--but I wanted to share a criteria I use when weighing the credibility of one op those guys.

 

I simply look at them and see if they look younger than their real age. If they do NOT, and indeed do not significantly look younger (10 years or more) then I do not even bother with reading or listening to their ideas.

 

Why? The proof is in the pudding, as I always say regarding health gurus. Or alleged ones. LIke me, a lifelong athlete, marital arts instructor, runner. I think I eat a pretty much optimal diet. Whenever I read one of those "New Superfoods for Health!" articles, almost always I am already partaking in most of them. I run 25 miles a week and usually win my age group in races. I am routines gauged at being ten years younger than I really am. My resting hr is about 52.   So I am a tough audience for these guys and their new-fangled anti-aging notions.

 

It's like how I used to laugh at Deprak Chopra. One of his books, something about how not to age ever! His pic on the front, and there he was, looking every bit if not more of his (then) 60 years. LOL. See, to me, a case like this is just tossed out a priori if the author does not seem to be benefitting from his preaching tactics.

 

Is this too harsh on my part?


Edited by Velocity_Boy, 16 March 2017 - 06:22 PM.

  • 0
"It's a good idea for a research scientist to discard a pet hypothesis every morning before breakfast. It keeps him young."

--Konrad Lorenz

#5 Phi for All

Phi for All

    Chief Executive Offworlder

  • Moderators
  • 16,559 posts
  • LocationCO, USA

Posted 20 March 2017 - 07:08 PM

!

Moderator Note

Some off-topic trolling and responses to it have been split to the Trash. If you can't be civil, you can't be here.


  • 0

"You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred!" -- Super Chicken
 


God does have to keep the miracles going, or no one would believe that He is real.


#6 quickquestion

quickquestion

    Atom

  • Senior Members
  • 338 posts

Posted 12 April 2017 - 05:20 PM

My hypothesis is, that by increasing Stem cells we are able to drastically increase our lifespans.

 

Please either refute or confirm my hypothesis.


  • 0

"Einstein and High Laurie's House, and even the star of the adult cartoon Archer (Sterling Archer) -and he's basically Jason Bourne, all have asperger's syndrome, which is autism without the bad side effects like poor muscle control, epilepsy, speech impediment, or any serious impairments. But they all have brain damage." - Super Polymath


#7 imatfaal

imatfaal

    lazy do-nothing mudslinger

  • Moderators
  • 7,482 posts
  • LocationSt James's Park

Posted 15 April 2017 - 08:46 PM

!

Moderator Note

 

My hypothesis is, that by increasing Stem cells we are able to drastically increase our lifespans.

 

Please either refute or confirm my hypothesis.

 

Off-topic and not the way science works.  Do not hijack discussions with tangential remarks and please be aware that the "refute or confirm" gambit is the tool of the crank.  If you can replace the core of your argument with " a teapot orbiting the sun somewhere between earth and mars" and not really change the import, validity, or evidential value of your claim then perhaps it is best to not make the contention in the first place 

 

Do not respond to this moderation within the thread. 

 


  • 0

A little learning is a dangerous thing; drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, and drinking largely sobers us again.

- Alexander Pope

 

feel free to click the green arrow  ---->

 





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users