fox1981 Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 If a male person who hasn't had sex till age 19 teens, suddenly loses his DNA genes chromosomes penis as well as testicles to another person who uses it, and his own is replaced by that another persons'. Then would that other person could use the first person penis as well as genes DNA chromosomes testicles to fertilize eggs of female and thereby producing offsprings of mixed race genetics? Then the first person of whose the original dna chromosomes testicles were, how can he identify in a crowd as to who has stolen his testicles and penis, and using it produce offsprings without his permission? As no name or identity is written over it, only that 23 pairs of chromosomes half from dad and half from mom constitute the existence of that came into being person...! If there is no incision made and by some hocus pocus magic the second person penis and testicles are artificially cultured mutated and sperm to genetically created to get a perfect resemblance to the first person. Like artificial exchange fertilization and genetic combination. So how does the second person of another genes penis and testicles were accepted by the first person body? like is this a possible like this practices are blindly accepted in some ignorant cultures? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 If a male person who hasn't had sex till age 19 teens, suddenly loses his DNA genes chromosomes penis as well as testicles to another person who uses it You can't lose your DNA/genes/chromosomes — it's in all of your cells. How exactly would another person "use" your penis and testicles? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 I don't understand exactly what's being asked. Is this a question about transplanting a penis and testicles, is that how the second person uses the first persons genitals? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fox1981 Posted January 18, 2017 Author Share Posted January 18, 2017 (edited) So if you understood this so well, then is this would be considered malpratices sins against god and culture? just tell me that? As i am against this. As the cells of our blood which constitutes the DNA strand, then even if DNA linkage could occur then it would be by sexual intercourse between a man and woman fertilization and effects seen in their offsprings. How can two different DNA genes of some first person penis testicles recombine so perfectly with the second person penis testicles genes? Edited January 18, 2017 by fox1981 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 So if you understood this so well, then is this would be considered malpratices sins against god and culture? just tell me that? How can something that looks to be impossible (until shown otherwise) be considered a sin? How does that question even come up? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fox1981 Posted January 18, 2017 Author Share Posted January 18, 2017 (edited) Might be that some societies might be living a hidden culture by making these usual practices recombining genes to malfunction than natural gods way path...coming through the ages.... As it could give Redbloodcorpuscles split leading to cancer etc... But perhaps the penis shape natural when in teens and odour color texture of spermatozoan cells remain the same till 40 to even 85 in males...? As in heart transplant and organ transplant then, how do they check in which blood a, a+, b, b+ or O or AB or AB+ could recombine so well into the recipient? Edited January 18, 2017 by fox1981 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 Here's the problem with what you're suggesting. Testicle transplants aren't done for the purpose of viable sperm production, mainly because the donor would be the father, not the recipient. If you can't get help through gene therapy or some other method to father your own children, the only other option for live birth is to use a donor. Which makes more sense, going through the surgery to transplant a testicle from the donor, or simply using the donor sperm? It's not a problem that needs an ethical solution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fox1981 Posted January 18, 2017 Author Share Posted January 18, 2017 (edited) Here's the problem with what you're suggesting. Testicle transplants aren't done for the purpose of viable sperm production, mainly because the donor would be the father, not the recipient. If you can't get help through gene therapy or some other method to father your own children, the only other option for live birth is to use a donor. Which makes more sense, going through the surgery to transplant a testicle from the donor, or simply using the donor sperm? It's not a problem that needs an ethical solution. What you are speaking writing of is arteficial insemination and sperm banking....thats not the answer to my thread question.... Edited January 18, 2017 by fox1981 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 What you are speaking writing of is arteficial insemination and sperm banking....thats not the answer to my thread question.... Could you ask that question again? I was confident I understood, and yet have failed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fox1981 Posted January 18, 2017 Author Share Posted January 18, 2017 sorry for this disgraceful question as i feel ashamed too, but i just checked on yahoo search that there is information about penis and testicles transplant who have lost them in accident or in war. But that is only for saving them mentally or for using them as a plaything as for sexual intercourse. But then as you say the donor and the recipient, sperm banking and artificial insemination is would be one and the same thing if the objective result is to be created effectively through penis testicle transplant. What i was saying that if the first person then receives back his own first born with penis and testicles whatever size and used up sperm in conditions it might be, then the resultant effects by the earlier replaced penis testicles would be minimized?? And same similar genes DNA of the whole blood rbc would be seen purity..... If all the people of various societies like india too are using these malpractices hidden culture but still perfecting out as some accomplishment in itself and still their neighbourhoods never came to know...then if somehow i had godly powers for a day, and through sky above i would had again switched back all the wrong doings genitals back to their original places, then the children born would have got confused as to whose father parentage where they born with ? -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 What i was saying that if the first person then receives back his own first born with penis and testicles whatever size and used up sperm in conditions it might be, then the resultant effects by the earlier replaced penis testicles would be minimized?? And same similar genes DNA of the whole blood rbc would be seen purity..... That doesn't make very much sense, I'm afraid. If all the people of various societies like india too are using these malpractices What malpractice are you referring to? As you say, penis transplants are pretty rare and only done where essential. You seem to be talking about some widespread practice, but it isn't clear what. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sensei Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 (edited) Might be that some societies might be living a hidden culture by making these usual practices recombining genes to malfunction than natural gods way path...coming through the ages.... There is no such thing as "natural gods way path".. The majority of living organisms simply divide their cell to two, and (sort of) two identical copy of cell is made. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell_division Differentiation of them happen because of mutation (f.e. radioactive isotopes decaying in the middle of cell division, cosmic rays passing through them in "wrong" place,"wrong" time, presence of reactive compounds, free radicals, etc. etc.) Source of radiation is random (etc), and effect is random, result of mutation can't be predicted in advance. Minority of high level living organisms are born after mixing genes, after sex between male and female parents. Male and female are the best they can find from their animal or human society. Male compete for females (sometimes reverse), so they can see their strength, and pick up appropriate partner for them. So effect of mixture of their genes is more predictable (it's widely used to get f.e. white pigeons, dogs and cats, pigs and cattle, with wanted features) Quantity of microorganisms in human body is enormous https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_microbiota There is more than 10^13 of living organisms in single human body, than humans alone. They ignore your "natural gods way path" of reproduction.. ps. Your way of thinking is biblical, with superiority of human.. Edited January 19, 2017 by Sensei Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fox1981 Posted January 19, 2017 Author Share Posted January 19, 2017 some people accept life changes as god's ways and it leads to corruption.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 some people accept life changes as god's ways and it leads to corruption.... ! Moderator Note Please abide by the rules you agreed to when you joined. Do NOT bring up supernatural explanations in a science thread in a science section of the site. Mainstream science only, please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now