Leaderboard

Thank you so much for your input! I was absolutely hoping for a response like this. I knew that there were inconsistencies, and I am glad that you pointed out and explained each inconsistency and flaw with this idea. When I say "independent research" I was mainly reading up on various reputable sources from various university websites that have certain topics that they have explained by lecturers posted online. I also have been listening to some physicists on youtube talk as well, but that can get a little sketchy, cause it's youtube after all. And then the chargeless and massless part I learned from cause I did not know that photons were massless and chargeless, but I did have "light" in mind because I knew that light was massless but didn't think that it was chargeless, but we are all wrong sometimes! I really am looking to get into this kind of field one way or another, but again, I gotta take baby steps. This was just an idea that I had that I wanted to bounce off already established laws and theories before I start doing anything serious with it! Thank you for that congrats! I like to try to stay humble with my ideas because I don't like to get cocky with this kind of stuff. I am completely unqualified and I really wanted to dive into the world of physics to try and better prove or disprove any ideas I may have. I do agree that I should get into some books and attend some courses but I gotta stick to my game design school so I don't fail it and miss out on a great opportunity like a B.S. in Game Design, you know? Both of you guys really helped me understand a lot! Thank you for your guys' inputs!

Oh FFS. Not another one!

Firstly congrats for at least realising that your idea is purely speculative. I say that because there are many unqualified people that come to a science forum to tell everyone participating, how mainstream science has got it wrong, and they have the answer! [Particularly in the fields of astrophysics/cosmology and astronomy]. Secondly while there certainly is still much that needs to be explained, there is also much that has been explained. Afterall we can now give a reasonable picture of the evolution of spacetime from 10-43 seconds after the BB event, up to the present day and even predict into the future. Thirdly Cosmology and other relevant sciences, are in my opinion anyway, the most awe inspiring, interesting, and fulfilling sciences there are. So why not read up with a few reputable books, or attend a course. That way you will most certainly realize then how much we do know. I'm speaking from experience matey as I'm a rank amateur lay person on this myself,

Tim Peake, the ESA astronaut ,told me an interesting story a few months ago. One of the people he knows was desperate to become an astronaut, he joined the USAF, trained as a fighter pilot, became a test pilot and applied. He failed the tryouts. A few years later he left the air force and retrained as a medical doctor. A couple years later NASA advertised for doctors to become astronauts to support the longer duration missions. He applied and was successful. A route to his dream that didn't even exist when he started out and one he never thought would happen.

So why doesn't The bombardment of Yeonpyeong count? I agree that I am unwilling to limit my comments to the unrealistically narrow view of the conflict that you are trying to force on the discussion. And don't complain about me insulting you when you call me a troll. It's rather hypocritical.

Just do what you want and it'll lead you to the best path for your life. Good luck.

So give me the damn cutoff already. And then explain why the US attacking other nations is relevant but NK attacking other nations is not.

Today I learned about Arthur C. Clarke's The Nine Billion Names of God.

They assert that the mass change is 0.186 mg or 1.86E-7 Kg Equivalent to a stored energy of 16 GJ or about 4 tonnes of TNT That's just silly. It's fake.

There is a physical difference between "erased" and data stored. Storing data means injecting electrons through an insulator onto an isolated conductor. So there will be a difference in energy (and, presumably, the number of electrons). I haven't done any calculations yet but it seems surprising that it would be easy to measure...

I think that is the last of the 9 billion names of God: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Nine_Billion_Names_of_God

Well, actually it isn't. Because of quantum theory, we know that space is not empty. There is a non-zero amount of energy even in "empty" space and, because of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, it is full of particle-antiparticle pairs constantly coming into existence and then disappearing again. This is perhaps the problem with "independent research". Unless you follow a very disciplined course of study (and there are many good books, courses and other resources available online) you may end up with some wrong ideas. You need to have a much more solid understanding before you are ready to start formulating your own ideas. It may not make sense to you, but that is the classical (pre-quantum) view and I see no problem with there being something surrounded by areas of nothingness. "Making sense" is almost the worst possible basis for a scientific theory. The universe may be finite or infinite. We just don't know. There are massless and changeless particles (e.g. the photon) which can have a known position, have momentum, etc. So this statement appears to be contradicted by reality. Well, congratulations on your interest in science. But you have a lot to learn - which is great! The fantastic thing about science is that there is always more to learn. But most people study these subjects for many years in order to get an understanding of the basics. So 24 hours is not much! You might be better off using this forum as place to learn by asking questions...

No, I wouldn't say Then we'll adopt the better way that has come along. Until there's a demonstrable better way, we'll stick with what works best.

I saw this and thought of you. China leads the way, maybe! https://phys.org/news/2017-08-chinese-team-quantum-keys-ground.html?utm_source=nwletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-nwletter

I am getting a bit over awed, by the numbers in the HIERACHY above humans . I had no idea that at least 100,000,000 ( 100 million ) ANGELS are in attendance around the EARTHS immediately future. (I was pointed to The Bible REVELATION chap 5 verse 11. ) So it would appear the whole of the next HIERACHY UP contains ONE BEING ( GOD) with a very very complex brain , capable of understanding and initiating the start of matter. ( the UNIVERSE ) Once this had expanded to a manageable size , The region of ITS ( GODS) domain was furnished with at least 100,000,000 overseeing beings called Angels ( that later got further divisions , Arc Angels, Sons of God ) . So rather than there being " absolutely nothing " constituting , a higher HIERACHY than mankind , there appears to be one ' heck of an overseeing organisation , that would make anything we have here on earth ' look like peanuts ' . We need to get our act together PDQ, ... METHINKS ps . We need to remember the Jewish nation became the caretakers of many of the Documents containing information about the early start of history of the human race , as well as its continuence until the Arrival of Jesus Christ, ( one of these Angelic SONS OF God , mentioned above ). And Hence the gathering together of more information , now found in the ' New Testament ' including REVELATION ( Quoted above about 100,000,000 Angels .) So we seem to be gathering quite a lot of Historical evidence , for this proposed HIERACHY, that I proposed. Rather than a big ' blank ' we seem to have unearthed quite a lot of evidence and character for the Human HIERACHY , integrated in human history across thousands of Years . As originally proposed. So somehow the HIERACHY has appeared at two levels , as Caretakers in the regions above . And as recipients in the regions below . ( has echoes of me above out of the water , as caretaker and my fish , below , Fish in the water as recipients of my care ) ! Now if that is not ' EVIDENCE ' , I do not know what is ? Well woven into human history over the last 6000 years ! Mike

Guys, you must use your brain if you want to understand something! But the better question I think do you even want to know? You do need to let go of the old, of things that you think you know. You must question everything! First you must understand why nothing cannot be. Only when you grasped this part, everything else will become clear to you. And give it at least a month or a year. Then tell me you did not understand. I don't expect anyone to understand it instantly! And till then whatever you say now means nothing to me. Good success!