corner
Science Forums, The Original
Home Community Chat Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Register
 

Welcome to ScienceForums.net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology and physics to computer science and mathematics, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!

After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us.

Have fun.
Go Back   Science Forums, The Original > Sciences > Mathematics
User Name
Password
   
Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
jcarlson  (Baryon)
Old March 2nd, 2005, 1:45 PM     #1 
The quirky nature of Pi... how is it possible?

pi is probably the strangest number on the planet.

On one hand, Pi is defined as a ratio... that of the Circumference of a circle to its diameter.

However, as far as I know, it is a nonrepeating infinite decimal, therefore making it an irrational number, correct?

So how is it that you can take a ratio, and get an irrational number out of it?
Joined Mar 2005 | 103 posts
Rep Power: 5 | Reputation: jcarlson is a decent person
Reply With Quote
   
noz92  (Atom)
Old March 2nd, 2005, 2:17 PM     #2 
\pi = \frac{C}{D}

One of the two (C or D) is an irrational number (if not both). So dividing the two would get you another irrational number: \pi.

An example:

C = 2\pi, D=2. \frac{2\pi}{2} = \pi

Last edited by noz92; March 2nd, 2005 at 2:20 PM..
Joined Jul 2004 | 276 posts | Location: Indiana
Rep Power: 6 | Reputation: noz92 is a decent person
Reply With Quote
   
jcarlson  (Baryon)
Old March 2nd, 2005, 9:20 PM     #3 
So how can we know that one of the two is irrational, when in order to determine PI, you have to measure the circumference and diameter of a circle, and even with the most advanced instruments, a measurement will never produce an irrational number because anything used to measure has finite precision?
Joined Mar 2005 | 103 posts
Rep Power: 5 | Reputation: jcarlson is a decent person
Reply With Quote
   
noz92  (Atom)
Old March 3rd, 2005, 2:04 PM     #4 
That's why we can only go up so far. We only know 6.4 digits. The world record for the most digits of \pi memorized is held by Hiroyuki Goto, who's memorized over 42,000 digits, taking him more than 9 hours to recite!
Joined Jul 2004 | 276 posts | Location: Indiana
Rep Power: 6 | Reputation: noz92 is a decent person
Reply With Quote
   
matt grime  (Organism)
Old March 8th, 2005, 9:34 AM     #5 
Do not confuse mathematics with the things it models. In the "real world" all caclulations are done with rational multiples with respect to some base measurement, but that says nothing about the acutal mathematical properties of numbers, it merely states something about the "real world". Numbers are not things that exsit in any physical sense, but there are things that exist in the physical world that numbers are useful for desribing properties of. God that was an ugly sentence.


But, basically, pi is a real number, it is irrational, even transcendental, and it is the the ratio of a geometric NOT real world quantities.

It can theoretically be evaluated in base ten to arbitrary precision, given enough time by one of the many series formulae for it. pi squared of six is for example the sum of the reciprocals of the squares of the natural numbers.
Joined Feb 2004 | 1,178 posts
Rep Power: 6 | Reputation: matt grime is a decent person
Reply With Quote
   
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
An illegal movement that my have quirky consequences Galaxy4 Speculations 6 March 15th, 2007 6:18 PM
IQ of nature reor General Discussion 26 May 15th, 2006 2:10 PM
The nature of proofs... silkworm Mathematics 3 February 27th, 2006 2:19 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 7:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content copyright ScienceForums.net 2002-2009
corner
corner