corner
Science Forums, The Original
Home Community Chat Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Register
 

Welcome to ScienceForums.net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology and physics to computer science and mathematics, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!

After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us.

Have fun.
Go Back   Science Forums, The Original > Sciences > Chemistry > Inorganic Chemistry
User Name
Password
   
Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Asimov Pupil  (Baryon)
Old April 12th, 2005, 3:52 PM     #1 
Inert Metals

can someone give a list of some inert metals?

much obliged
______________
I have gone to find myself. If I get back before I return, keep me here
Joined Dec 2004 | 134 posts | Location: over here
Rep Power: 6 | Reputation: Asimov Pupil is a decent person
Reply With Quote
   
budullewraagh  (Primate)
Old April 12th, 2005, 4:43 PM     #2 
well they arent quit inert, but some "inert" metals are:
Rh, Pt, Ni, Pd, Au, Ag, Ir, Os
Joined Apr 2004 | 2,949 posts
Rep Power: 7 | Reputation: budullewraagh is a decent person
Reply With Quote
   
Asimov Pupil  (Baryon)
Old April 12th, 2005, 4:58 PM     #3 
thank you
______________
I have gone to find myself. If I get back before I return, keep me here
Joined Dec 2004 | 134 posts | Location: over here
Rep Power: 6 | Reputation: Asimov Pupil is a decent person
Reply With Quote
   
H2SO4  (Molecule)
Old April 12th, 2005, 5:55 PM     #4 
Originally Posted by budullewraagh

well they arent quit inert, but some "inert" metals are:
Rh, Pt, Ni, Pd, Au, Ag, Ir, Os


You should preobaly disclude Ag and Ni. Just my opinion.
Joined Mar 2005 | 605 posts | Location: California
Rep Power: 5 | Reputation: H2SO4 is a decent person | Send a message via AIM to H2SO4 Send a message via MSN to H2SO4 Send a message via Yahoo to H2SO4
Reply With Quote
   
budullewraagh  (Primate)
Old April 12th, 2005, 6:01 PM     #5 
why? ag is less active than, say, Au. Ni isnt very active either
Joined Apr 2004 | 2,949 posts
Rep Power: 7 | Reputation: budullewraagh is a decent person
Reply With Quote
   
Tetrahedrite  (Molecule)
Old April 12th, 2005, 6:02 PM     #6 
Originally Posted by H2SO4

You should preobaly disclude Ag and Ni. Just my opinion.

I probably wouldn't include Ag, and most definitely wouldn't include NI.
______________
"I contend we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours"

Jean-Paul Sartre
Joined Oct 2004 | 528 posts | Location: Blue Mountains, Australia
Rep Power: 6 | Reputation: Tetrahedrite is a decent person
Reply With Quote
   
budullewraagh  (Primate)
Old April 12th, 2005, 7:15 PM     #7 
i forgot ruthenium. and i guess i'll take back what i asid about nickel
Joined Apr 2004 | 2,949 posts
Rep Power: 7 | Reputation: budullewraagh is a decent person
Reply With Quote
   
H2SO4  (Molecule)
Old April 12th, 2005, 7:27 PM     #8 
Originally Posted by budullewraagh

why? ag is less active than, say, Au. Ni isnt very active either

are you on crack. Gold is not more reactive than silver.
Joined Mar 2005 | 605 posts | Location: California
Rep Power: 5 | Reputation: H2SO4 is a decent person | Send a message via AIM to H2SO4 Send a message via MSN to H2SO4 Send a message via Yahoo to H2SO4
Reply With Quote
   
budullewraagh  (Primate)
Old April 12th, 2005, 8:20 PM     #9 
your word over the state of new york? ok
Joined Apr 2004 | 2,949 posts
Rep Power: 7 | Reputation: budullewraagh is a decent person
Reply With Quote
   
Tetrahedrite  (Molecule)
Old April 12th, 2005, 9:04 PM     #10 
I think the answer to this question is best found in nature. I will explain.
In this case I would descibe inert metals as those that are found mostly in a native state in the environment. These include Au, Pt, Ir, Os, Pd, Rh, Ru. Metals such as Hg, Ag and Cu are certainly known as native metals, but are more commonly found in an oxidised state. For example both Hg and Ag are commonly found in sulfides (cinnabar, acanthite) and sulfosalts (tetrahedrite for example, see the name; I know what I'm talking about ), and in halides (calomel and chlorargyrite to name but a few).

As far as I am aware, Ni is never found on earth as the native metal (except in meteorites) and is almost exclusive found as Ni2+ and very occasionally Ni3+.
______________
"I contend we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours"

Jean-Paul Sartre
Joined Oct 2004 | 528 posts | Location: Blue Mountains, Australia
Rep Power: 6 | Reputation: Tetrahedrite is a decent person
Reply With Quote
   
jdurg  (Resident Expert)
Old April 13th, 2005, 6:07 AM     #11 
jdurg's Avatar
Chemistry Expert
Originally Posted by budullewraagh

why? ag is less active than, say, Au. Ni isnt very active either

Sorry Budellewraagh, but I have to disagree with you here. Look at ANY activity series or standard reduction potential series and you will find that gold is not as high in the listings as silver is. Silver is by far more active/reactive than gold is.
Joined Sep 2004 | 2,066 posts | Location: SE Connecticut, USA
Rep Power: 7 | Reputation: jdurg is on a distinguished road | Send a message via AIM to jdurg
Reply With Quote
   
budullewraagh  (Primate)
Old April 13th, 2005, 7:07 PM     #12 
i could have sworn i saw silver below gold on the new york regents tables. i checked the potentials though and recognize the greater activity of silver relative to gold
Joined Apr 2004 | 2,949 posts
Rep Power: 7 | Reputation: budullewraagh is a decent person
Reply With Quote
   
mmalluck  (Baryon)
Old April 13th, 2005, 10:07 PM     #13 
Let me ask you two question.

How often do you polish silver?

How often do you polish gold?
Joined Jan 2005 | 196 posts | Location: Atlanta
Rep Power: 6 | Reputation: mmalluck is a decent person | Send a message via ICQ to mmalluck Send a message via AIM to mmalluck Send a message via MSN to mmalluck Send a message via Yahoo to mmalluck
Reply With Quote
   
H2SO4  (Molecule)
Old April 14th, 2005, 1:00 AM     #14 
silver also tarnishes fairly quick in the presence of sulfur.
Joined Mar 2005 | 605 posts | Location: California
Rep Power: 5 | Reputation: H2SO4 is a decent person | Send a message via AIM to H2SO4 Send a message via MSN to H2SO4 Send a message via Yahoo to H2SO4
Reply With Quote
   
budullewraagh  (Primate)
Old April 14th, 2005, 1:48 PM     #15 
i dont have gold/silver to polish:\
Joined Apr 2004 | 2,949 posts
Rep Power: 7 | Reputation: budullewraagh is a decent person
Reply With Quote
   
5614  (Genius)
Old April 14th, 2005, 2:12 PM     #16 
Exclamation

Originally Posted by H2SO4

are you on crack. Gold is not more reactive than silver.

uh, I don't think so!

If in doubt, use google!

So search:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...ty+series&meta=

1st link -- your wrong
2nd link -- irrelevant
3rd link -- your wrong
4th -- your wrong
5th -- your wrong
6th -- irrelevant
7th -- your wrong
etc etc
______________
Jonathan aka 5614
---
So, is the universe indeterministic? Probably!
Joined Jun 2004 | 5,171 posts | Location: London, UK
Rep Power: 9 | Reputation: 5614 is on a distinguished road
Reply With Quote
   
darth tater  (Banned)
Old April 14th, 2005, 2:19 PM     #17 
I don't know the symbol, but how about Titanium?
Joined Apr 2005 | 109 posts
Rep Power: 0 | Reputation: darth tater is a decent person
Reply With Quote
   
budullewraagh  (Primate)
Old April 14th, 2005, 4:21 PM     #18 
Ti, and no, it's definitely not inert
Joined Apr 2004 | 2,949 posts
Rep Power: 7 | Reputation: budullewraagh is a decent person
Reply With Quote
   
H2SO4  (Molecule)
Old April 14th, 2005, 4:46 PM     #19 
Originally Posted by 5614

uh, I don't think so!

If in doubt, use google!

So search:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...ty+series&meta=

1st link -- your wrong
2nd link -- irrelevant
3rd link -- your wrong
4th -- your wrong
5th -- your wrong
6th -- irrelevant
7th -- your wrong
etc etc



I dont get it why is it so hard for you to understand that silver is more reactive than gold. GOLD IS MORE NOBLE THAN SILVER!


Wait, 5614, are you saying what i said is wrong or what budellegraph (or watever ) said is wrong?
Joined Mar 2005 | 605 posts | Location: California
Rep Power: 5 | Reputation: H2SO4 is a decent person | Send a message via AIM to H2SO4 Send a message via MSN to H2SO4 Send a message via Yahoo to H2SO4
Reply With Quote
   
akcapr  (Protist)
Old April 14th, 2005, 5:38 PM     #20 
ya. ALso, what explains the fact that there are alot fewer gold compounds than silver compounds- such as silver nitrate, silver chloride, silver sulfide, silver selenide, silver oxide, silver iodide, etc. you get my point.
______________
:)
Joined Mar 2005 | 972 posts | Location: woodinville, washington
Rep Power: 5 | Reputation: akcapr is a decent person | Send a message via AIM to akcapr
Reply With Quote
   
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
inert Pair Effect ChemSiddiqui Inorganic Chemistry 6 November 20th, 2007 10:44 AM
Non-Metals foodchain Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 0 February 26th, 2007 3:26 PM
Papp inert gas engine. alt_f13 Classical Physics 4 March 30th, 2006 5:39 PM
Why metals..? albertlee Inorganic Chemistry 9 September 20th, 2005 9:58 PM
Mu metals 5614 Modern and Theoretical Physics 9 April 17th, 2005 10:38 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 7:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content copyright ScienceForums.net 2002-2009
corner
corner