admiral_ju00
July 11th, 2004, 4:06 AM
There are some interesting debates about the early members of our species, that I'd like to share and have a debate here.
Is visual thinking mean the same thing as symbolic thinking?
Can a picture drawn of some object be though of as symbolic - therefore requiring a more complicated though pattern or is it merely an icon?
Some of the earliest, most detailed artwork found was the one by the Cro-Magnons. That is highly suggestive that the Cro-Manon(humans) who lived from about 40,000-10,000, was the first early members of the genus Homo that was able to process all 3 of the components that clearly separate us from all other animals on this planet. Those being and ability to use and process: Icon, Index, Symbol.
But were they the first of all the members of the genus Homo to be capable of abstract thinking?
For example, it IS the most common misconception about the Neanderthals in that they were nothing more than dumb brutes, hence the selection dealt against them, where as Cro-Magnons continued.
What do you think?
Is visual thinking mean the same thing as symbolic thinking?
Can a picture drawn of some object be though of as symbolic - therefore requiring a more complicated though pattern or is it merely an icon?
Some of the earliest, most detailed artwork found was the one by the Cro-Magnons. That is highly suggestive that the Cro-Manon(humans) who lived from about 40,000-10,000, was the first early members of the genus Homo that was able to process all 3 of the components that clearly separate us from all other animals on this planet. Those being and ability to use and process: Icon, Index, Symbol.
But were they the first of all the members of the genus Homo to be capable of abstract thinking?
For example, it IS the most common misconception about the Neanderthals in that they were nothing more than dumb brutes, hence the selection dealt against them, where as Cro-Magnons continued.
What do you think?