View Full Version : Convergence and Common Ancestry
blike
December 29th, 2002, 3:04 PM
How do we distinguish convergent evolution from common ancestry?
hows that for short and sweet :)
I'm on vacation right now, as is faf. We'll be back to normal when school kicks back up.
blike
January 7th, 2003, 8:02 PM
bump.
anyone?
Sayonara³
January 8th, 2003, 4:04 AM
Isn't common ancestry basically another way of saying 'divergence'?
Giles
January 8th, 2003, 5:41 PM
(Molecular) cladistics gives the most parsimonious phylogeny.
The odds of molecular convergence (as opposed to conservation) across a lot of characteristics are pretty low.
Eli_Cash
November 2nd, 2003, 2:00 PM
Convergence is a similarity that doesn't make sense in terms of a historical relationship that evolutionists find platable. For example, I believe human eyes are more similar to those of the squid than to those of apes, but no one wants to say that we inherited this trait from a squid, so it's dismissed as convergence. (It may be an octopus, but I think it's a squid.) There really is no other reason than agreement with the theory. As such, evolutionists really shouldn't use homology as an evidence for evolution, since they are selective about it according to what they've already decided about the theory.
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.