PDA

View Full Version : Force Problem


EvoN1020v
February 10th, 2006, 4:26 PM
I confronted this force problem in the Physics Nelson's Textbook, and my teacher gave us a lot of other questions except this one. I told her, I wanted to do it to challenge myself. But oddly enough, I'm struggling with it.

Here's the question:
A traffic light hangs in the centre of the road from cables as shown in the figure. If the mass of the traffic light is 65 kg, what force must the cables exert on the light to prevent it from falling? (Hint: Since the angles that cables make with the hortionzal are the same (12 degrees), they both exert forces of the same magntiude.

Any suggestions?

JustStuit
February 10th, 2006, 4:33 PM
Since they must conteract the weight they would each need to pull

F= mg = \frac{(65kg) (9.80 m/s^2)}{2} = 32.5g N = 318.5 N
(at the surface of the earth) upward. Do the angles affect the force at all? I'm not sure.

:edit: I'm assuming two wires hold it up. Now I'm even less sure the angles don't mean anything.

timo
February 10th, 2006, 4:53 PM
Draw the forces in the diagram and see if that helps you. If not, post the diagram here; someone will tell you the next step (or what you did wrong, depending on what´s the case).

EvoN1020v
February 10th, 2006, 6:29 PM
I thought my question explained what the diagram would look like. Here's the diagram:

1212

timo
February 10th, 2006, 6:30 PM
Yes, your question did explain it. But I thought my answer also explained that I proposed you draw the forces into that diagram - because that´s the way to solve it unless you know how to work with vectors.

EDIT: Actually, drawing the forces into the diagram is a good idea even if you know how to work with vectors. It is a great help for visualizing what you are doing.

EvoN1020v
February 10th, 2006, 6:34 PM
I do know how to work with vectors. Fg for the hanging light? And force applied at both angles. I'm just having a problem how to find the magntiude of the force at those 2 directions.

timo
February 10th, 2006, 6:46 PM
mg for the gravitational force acting on the light; F1 and F2 for the forces exerted by the cables. mg + F1 + F2 = m*a = 0.

swansont
February 11th, 2006, 6:14 AM
There is no net acceleration, so all the forces must add to zero, in both the vertical and horizontal direction. Atheist has given you the equation for the vertical, and the hint in the problem tells you that F1=F2. The angle will matter if you need to find the actual tension in the cable, but that's not what was asked in the problem.

timo
February 11th, 2006, 7:04 AM
Atheist has given you the equation for the vertical ...
Actually, I didnīt. At least, I didnīt intend to. g, F1, F2 and 0 were supposed to be vectors.

... and the hint in the problem tells you that F1=F2.
or |F1|=|F2| if they are vectors.

the tree
February 11th, 2006, 7:33 AM
Try just looking at one cable, then draw it as the hypotenuse of a right angled triangle with the right angle being at the middle of the crossbar.

Your vertical line represents the vertical component of the cable, if you remember your trig you'll see that it's T_{1}\sin{12} (T being tension in the cable).

You also know that the sum of both the vertical components is equal to 65gN in order to be keeping the trafic lights still.
2(T_{1}\sin{12})=65gN

...and now I go look for my calculator....

5614
February 11th, 2006, 2:39 PM
2( T_1 sin12 ) = 65 g N
Will give you the tension (as the tree said) and as both cables are at the same angle the tension in each string will be the same.

If they were at different angles then you would have to use:

( T_1 sin12 ) + ( T_2 sin12 ) = 65 g N
Where T_2 is the tension in the 2nd string. It doesn't make a difference which one you call 1 and 2, just keep it constant throughout the calculation.

You could also say that:
( T_1 cos12 ) + ( T_2 cos12 ) = 0
because as there is acceleration the forces must sum to 0, so the horizontal components of both T1 and T2 must sum to 0.

You would then combine the two equations using simultaneous equations.

You get that kind of question for Maths (Mechanics 1) if you are doing this for AS Level (pg84 (Qs 7 & 8) of the orange Heinemann Modular Mathematics Mechanics 1 book).

EvoN1020v
February 13th, 2006, 3:23 PM
I got the value of 3,066.9 N for both of the tensions.

This is how I solve this:
\sin12=\frac{637.65}{T_{1}}

Am I correct?

5614
February 13th, 2006, 3:39 PM
If you're formula was correct then yes because this:
\sin12=\frac{637.65}{T_{1}}
Rearranges to:
T_1 = \frac{637.65}{sin12}
Stick it in on a calculator and you get the answer 3066.927 (to 3 decimal places)

But where did you get that equation from?

We said:

2( T_1 sin12 ) = 65 g

Which rearranges to

T_1 sin12 = \frac {65g}{2} = 318.5

T_1 = \frac{318.5}{sin12}

T_1 = 1531.900 (to 3 decimal places)

Basically I think you ignored the 2 and so your answer was double the expected value. And what value did you use for g? (I've used 9.8)

EvoN1020v
February 13th, 2006, 4:16 PM
I used the value of 9.81 for the g. Why did you divide it by 2 though? I kinda focusing my answer on one rope, not both. So you're assuring that you divide the tensions by 2 to give the value for each rope?

5614
February 13th, 2006, 4:26 PM
I think you are asking why is there a 2 at the beginning of this equation:
2( T_1 sin12 ) = 65 g

If so it is because both ropes (ie. 2 ropes, T1 and T2) contribute a vertical tension. The vertical component of T1 AND the vertical component of T2 together sum to the total vertical tension in the whole thing. Another way of writing the formula which would be clearer is to say:

( T_1 sin12 ) + ( T_2 sin12) = 65 g

Where T1 = T2... which is why we simplified it.

Does that make it clearer?

EvoN1020v
February 13th, 2006, 7:12 PM
Yes, thank you. :-)

EvoN1020v
February 14th, 2006, 9:58 AM
2(T_{1}cos12)=637.65N yields 1.3x10^{3}N.

I just learnt this today in school, and I'll post the explanation later. (Lunch time is over, so I have to head back to class). :cool:

EvoN1020v
February 15th, 2006, 9:14 AM
\sum{F_{x}} = (F_{a})_{x} - (F_{b})_{x}

Acos12 - Bcos12 = 0

cos12(A-B) = 0

\frac{cos12(A-B)}{cos12}

(A-B) = 0

A = B


Let A = B = T (Tension).


\sum{F_{y}} = (F_{a})_{y} + (F_{b})_{y} - F_{g} = 0

Asin12 + Bsin12 - 637.65N = 0

sin12(A+B) - 637.65N = 0

sin12(T+T) - 637.65N = 0

2Tsin12 - 637.65N = 0

2Tsin12 = 637.65N

T=\frac{637.65N}{2(sin12)} = 1.5x10^3N


Both of the ropes are equal, so the answer of T_{1} and T_{2} is: 1.5 x 10^{3} N.

5614
February 16th, 2006, 7:03 AM
2(T_{1}cos12)=637.65N yields 1.3x10^{3}N.

I just learnt this today in school, and I'll post the explanation later. (Lunch time is over, so I have to head back to class). :cool:

I think you meant to put sine instead of cosine in that equation.

EvoN1020v
February 16th, 2006, 3:07 PM
Whoops. :embarass: Pardon for all the \cos, as they should be \sin. It's too late to edit my post, so thanks 5614 for the warning.

EvoN1020v
February 17th, 2006, 8:51 AM
I have another question:

A 1.0 kg wood block is pressed against the wood wall by the 12N force down. If the block is initially at rest, will it move upward, move downward, or stay at rest? (The coefficient of static friction for wood is 0.50 and the coefficent of kinetic friction is 0.20).

1230



My answer is that the block won't move, because the resultant vector (V_{r}) is lesser than F_{fsmax}, where V_{r} = 3.81 N, and F_{fsmax} = 5.196 N.

Am I correct?

Klaynos
February 17th, 2006, 9:11 AM
It will stay stationary, as the gravity force is bigger than the upwards force, but this is countered by fmax

EvoN1020v
February 17th, 2006, 3:06 PM
So you're saying that I'm correct? Are the values accurate comparing to yours?

EvoN1020v
February 18th, 2006, 8:38 AM
Can anybody answer my question?

5614
February 20th, 2006, 4:57 AM
We're only really worried about vertical forces here. I'll do all my working here now, hopefully it will turn out the same as yours!

All vertically:

Block pushes down with F = weight - friction = 9.8 - [\mu R] 0.5*12cos30 = 4.6...

The force supplies 12sin30 = 6N upwards. So the force supplied is enough to move the block up BUT we need to include friction for the upwards direction.

F up = 6 - 0.5*12cos30 = 0.8...

Net force vertically (take up as positive) is:
-3.6N

Remember there is friction acting against that, friction is equal to (when stationary) \mu R = 0.5 * 12cos(30) = 5.20 which is bigger than the 3.6N (direction is irrelevant here) net force we have acting on the square, therefore the square will not move.

So yeah, I get all the same values as you, your values are more accurate than mine though.

EvoN1020v
February 21st, 2006, 9:49 AM
Thanks 5614. I got another challenging physcis question for you guys:

A 40 kg boy works at his dad's hardware store. One of the boy's jobs is to unload the delivery truck. He places each package on a 30 degrees ramp and shove it up the ramp into the storeroom. He needs to shove the package with an acceleration of at least 0.1 m/s^2 in order for the package to make it to the top of the ramp. One day the ground is wet with rain and he's wearing slick leather-soled shoes. The coefficient of static friction between his shoes and the ground is 0.25. The largest package of the day is 15 kg, and it's coefficient of static friction on the ramp is 0.40. Can he give the package a big enough shove to reach the top of the ramp without his feet slipping?

5614
February 21st, 2006, 11:49 AM
Well lets see:

He needs to push at a=0.1

Biggest mass = 15

therefore F = ma = 15 * 0.1 = 1.5N

Now can I assume that he pushes up at 30 degrees or does his line of force act horizontally? That makes a difference. If he pushes it at 30 deg then he needs F = 1.5 but if he pushes horizontally he would need a force which gives a component of the force up the slope of 1.5N

See the difference? Does he need to supply the 1.5N or supply something which has a component of 1.5N ?

Anyway once you know the force he needs to push then remember that if he pushes the load with a force F then the load pushes him with a force F (in the opposite direction). Include friction, work out the overall force required to move the box. Use F = \mu R to see if the force he has to supply is bigger than the frictional force which is available. If friction is bigger than he can move it, if friction is smaller than the force he is applying then he will slide.

EvoN1020v
February 22nd, 2006, 9:04 AM
One thing: I mistype the value of acceleration, it should be 1.0 m/s^2 instead. Therefore, the applied force (F_{app}) would be 15 N.

First thing I did: Find the friction Force when the boy push the 15 kg box.

\sum F_x = F_{app} - F_f - (F_g)_x = ma
F_f = F_{app} - (F_g)_x - ma

F_{app} and -ma cancel each other, so that remains (F_g)_x which is mgsin30.

The friction force is: 73.575 N.

What I do next? I know that the friction force is greater than the applied force but, he have a mass of 40 kg, so I'm not sure how to join that reference to figure out my answer?

Maybe I should figure out the F_{fsmax} for his shoe to the ground? Any help here please?

5614
February 22nd, 2006, 2:47 PM
I haven't properly read your post, just the question, will reply properly tomorrow but if it helps then to involve the boy's mass... well I dunno what you did without it! (can't stop to read it now) but the boys mass will effect the maximum amount of friction he can have.

Frictional forces are F= \mu R where R is his reaction, which will be equal to his weight. Weight = mg. That's where 'm' (mass) comes into it.

Will look at the prob more tomorrow.

EvoN1020v
February 22nd, 2006, 7:55 PM
never have seen F = \mu R before?

I know that the boy's weight is 392.4 N.

5614
February 23rd, 2006, 10:16 AM
Doubley posty, oops!

5614
February 23rd, 2006, 10:17 AM
You have seen F = \mu R before! How do you work out the force which can be supplied due to friction? I think you do know it but maybe just haven't ever had it written out like that.

The force (F) is equal to the coefficient of friction (\mu) multiplied by the reaction (R).

If the boy's mass is 40kg, then his weight is 392N (I use g as 9.8) and the coefficient of friction is 0.25 then the maximum value of friction (which is a force) is F_{friction} = \mu_{coefficient-of-friction} R_{reaction} = 0.25_{given-in-the-question} * 392_{mass * gravity} = 98N

Now remember Newtons 3rd Law, if the boy pushes the box with a force F then the box pushes the boy with a force F in the opposite direction.

So now quite simply if he has to push with more than 98N then he will be being pushed with more than 98N and so he will slide, because the greatest force friction can supply is 98N. If he's pushing the box with >98N then he's being pushed with >98N which will overcome friction and so he will slide.

The problem to me is what force does he apply? Do you follow what I was saying at the end of post #27? Is he applying a force horizontally or is he applying the force up the slope? That makes a difference to the answer.

You know how to work out the frictional force on the box, it's the same method for the boy.

The maximum force due to friction on the box I get as F_{friction} = \mu R = 0.25 * 73.575_{mgsin \theta = 15 * 9.8 * sin30 = 73.5 (rounded)} = 18.394N so now you need to account for the force required to push the box (which I'm not certain on, see above) and then add the friction.

Is it getting clearer?